Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 1 update in 1 topic

John-Del <ohger1s@gmail.com>: Sep 02 11:15AM -0700

On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 10:34:38 AM UTC-4, Stu jaxon wrote:
> is there a difference between tcon t550hvn03.5, and board t550hvn03.2..? in other words will the 3.2 board work in a scept e55,.?
 
My database says yes, but I've found some applications don't swap as they say. In any case, it won't do any harm. Any potential difference is most likely software loaded to match the tcon to the display. If you have the 3.2 to try, try it.
 
If you have the number on the display itself, post that number.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to sci.electronics.repair+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 3 updates in 2 topics

Stu jaxon <stankowalski02@gmail.com>: Sep 02 07:34AM -0700

is there a difference between tcon t550hvn03.5, and board t550hvn03.2..? in other words will the 3.2 board work in a scept e55,.?
Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com>: Sep 01 05:52PM

On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 22:42:01 -0700, tabbypurr wrote:
 
> Not a bad idea. They'd last ages too.
 
They sure would. Their combined internal resistances would see to that;
law of diminishing returns and all that. You really need to establish
what the likely anode current will be.
Amazing what they did with just one tube, though! Got to admire the
resourcefulness that went into such designs.
 
 
 
--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.
tabbypurr@gmail.com: Sep 01 04:38PM -0700

On Sunday, 1 September 2019 18:52:23 UTC+1, Cursitor Doom wrote:
 
> They sure would. Their combined internal resistances would see to that;
> law of diminishing returns and all that. You really need to establish
> what the likely anode current will be.
 
2-3mA. PP3s can kick out over 100mA.
 
> Amazing what they did with just one tube, though! Got to admire the
> resourcefulness that went into such designs.
 
Oh yes. Resourceful was the name of the game for a long time, now that silicon's cheap few care about efficiency or smart tricks.
 
 
NT
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to sci.electronics.repair+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 1 update in 1 topic

bruce2bowser@gmail.com: Sep 01 06:54AM -0700

I Visited 47 Sites. Hundreds of Trackers Followed Me. (Op/Ed)
New York Times - August 23, 2019
-- https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/08/23/opinion/data-internet-privacy-tracking.html
 
(By Nadieh Bremer. "Additional reporting and design by Stuart A. Thompson, Jessia Ma and Aaron Krolik. Illustration by Jessia Ma.
 
Like other media companies, The Times collects data on its visitors when they read stories like this one. For more detail please see our privacy policy and our publisher's description of The Times's practices and continued steps to increase transparency and protections.
 
Follow @privacyproject on Twitter and The New York Times Opinion Section on Facebook and Instagram.
 
Farhad Manjoo became an opinion columnist for The Times in 2018. Before that, they wrote the State of the Art column. They are the author of "True Enough: Learning to Live in a Post-Fact Society." @fmanjoo • Facebook
 
Nadieh Bremer is an award-winning data visualization designer working under the name Visual Cinnamon.")
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to sci.electronics.repair+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.