Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 8 updates in 2 topics

knuttle <keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net>: Dec 28 12:06PM -0500

On 12/28/2021 2:57 AM, rbowman wrote:
 
> You're right. I didn't even think at the understanding level.
 
That's where I'm leaning, which means the entire class can be taught inside
the classroom like most of the other classes are.
 
I would think there should be a chapter each on each "thing" kids need to
know about (perhaps homes, vehicles, measurements, debugging, PCs, etc.).
 
In each chapter I would think it could dive down into the "systems" involved
such as the cooling system for a car, or the plumbing system for a house or
the electrical system for a computer.
 
> phenolic impeller in the water pump detached from the shaft you learn
> about cooling systems to say nothing of Chrysler's decision to use a
> plastic impeller.
 
Repair starts with debug.
Debug ends with isolation of the failed component.
But debug starts with understanding the systems & isolation of the failure.
 
Without understanding of the system, there's no repair possible unless we
teach the kids to just throw parts at the problem.
 
Admittedly, a _lot_ of cars are fixed by people throwing parts at them! :)
 
> Chrysler product also taught you not all threads a
> right handed.
 
My first Chrysler was a New Yorker which, as I recall, had reverse threaded
lug bolts on one side, but normally threaded lug bolts on the other.
 
Nobody told me this. After doing the one side, I wrenched off two or three
before I realized "something" was very wrong on the other side.
 
There were no "warning labels" in those days. :)
 
> I'd guess the average high school kid knows as much about how a car
> works as how their iPhone does. It's all magic.
 
This is a good observation, where we could add a systems approach to how
basic electronics work also (sci.electronics.repair).
rbowman <bowman@montana.com>: Dec 28 12:28PM -0700

On 12/28/2021 10:06 AM, knuttle wrote:
 
> Without understanding of the system, there's no repair possible unless we
> teach the kids to just throw parts at the problem.
 
> Admittedly, a _lot_ of cars are fixed by people throwing parts at them! :)
 
Debugging is more complex. My first go around was with my '82 Firebird
which was early in the computer controlled game. It would run fine,
stumble at odd and inconvenient intervals, and then run fine. Carb
problem. but what, with the oxygen sensor, etc. Of course, running down
the tree the measurements were on the low side of the acceptable range.
I finally pulled the carb. There was a solenoid controlled valve to
control the mixture. The problem was what looked like a little piece of
neoprene that would randomly hold the needle open.
 
I didn't feel bad as the guy running the project was having problems
with his Pontiac and it was in and out of the shop as they tried to
debug it. His son was the service manager so they weren't screwing him
over.
 
Another friend bought a Cadillac around the same time that also turned
into a shop queen. He went to visit the car one day to find all the
mechanics standing around poking at the computer like it had fallen off
a passing UFO.
 
 
> Nobody told me this. After doing the one side, I wrenched off two or three
> before I realized "something" was very wrong on the other side.
 
> There were no "warning labels" in those days. :)
 
It stimulated the market for replacement studs. Most of them did have an
L stamped on the end but who looks at the end of the stud when changing
a tire?
 
>> works as how their iPhone does. It's all magic.
 
> This is a good observation, where we could add a systems approach to how
> basic electronics work also (sci.electronics.repair).
 
We have a new library that finally opened after a year delay for the
virus. It has a large and well-equipped 'maker space' that I'm hoping
attracts at least some kids. There are several 3D printers, laser
cutters, work stations, 3D scanners and so forth. I think there is a
selection of Arduinos and rPis with peripherals too. The library also
subscribes to Make magazine.
 
https://makezine.com/
 
There a media labs and so forth for the kids that swing that way. The
opportunities are all there and free except for nominal charges for the
3D printer materials.
 
The question is what per cent of the kids will make use of it. I don't
have high hopes. Like it always was the smart kids will have a field
day. The rest will be watching TikTok videos and could care less. Like
Shaw said when defining 'horticulture', you can lead a whore to culture
but you can't make her think.
Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>: Dec 28 08:42PM +0100

On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 12:28:58 -0700, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:
 
 
> Debugging is more complex. My first go around was
 
Oh, FUCK! The blabbermouth starts again...
 
<FLUSH the rest of the senile gossip's endless senile blather unread again>
 
--
Yet more absolutely idiotic senile blather by lowbrowwoman:
"I save my fries quota for one of the local food trucks that offers
poutine every now and then. If you're going for a coronary might as well
do it right."
MID: <ivdi4gF8btlU1@mid.individual.net>
AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org>: Dec 28 02:30PM -0600

On 12/28/2021 1:28 PM, rbowman wrote:
> videos and could care less. Like Shaw said when defining
> 'horticulture', you can lead a whore to culture but you
> can't make her think.
 
Ahem.
That was the sainted Dorothy Parker.
 
--
Andrew Muzi
<www.yellowjersey.org/>
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
rbowman <bowman@montana.com>: Dec 28 09:50PM -0700

On 12/28/2021 01:30 PM, AMuzi wrote:
 
> Ahem.
> That was the sainted Dorothy Parker.
 
I stand corrected. Shaw had some snappy quotes but that wasn't one of them.
 
"Discussing vaccination with a doctor is like discussing vegetarianism
with a butcher."
 
https://www.azquotes.com/author/13418-George_Bernard_Shaw
 
Apropos to some of the threads in this group...
Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>: Dec 29 10:21AM +0100

On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 21:50:02 -0700, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:
 
 
> I stand corrected.
 
Corrected ...but still blabbering in your bigmouthed manner!
 
--
Gossiping "lowbrowwoman" about herself:
"Usenet is my blog... I don't give a damn if anyone ever reads my posts
but they are useful in marshaling [sic] my thoughts."
MID: <iteioiF60jmU1@mid.individual.net>
Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net>: Dec 28 01:17PM -0500

In article <sqfe7s$3lp$2@reader1.panix.com>, wb8foz@panix.com says...
 
> In MD, "occasional personal use" is allowed. Plus, you can get
> special plates; i.e. amateur radio+historic. And AFAICT, the
> amateur radio plates then do not say historic on them.
 
In NC the amateur radio plates cost more , Last time I checked they
cost between a regular plate and one of the plates with letters and
numbers of your choice. There are other plates like clubs that also
cost more than regular plates
KenW <ken1943@invalid.net>: Dec 28 02:25PM -0700

On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 13:17:56 -0500, Ralph Mowery
>cost between a regular plate and one of the plates with letters and
>numbers of your choice. There are other plates like clubs that also
>cost more than regular plates
 
Colorado last time I looked $65
 
 
KenW
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to sci.electronics.repair+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

No Response to "Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 8 updates in 2 topics"

Post a Comment