Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 4 updates in 1 topic

"ohg...@gmail.com" <ohger1s@gmail.com>: Sep 30 10:31AM -0700

On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 11:12:59 AM UTC-4, JC wrote:
 
> not familiar with the amp and not an audio guy but:
> 15Khz sounds like switching supply noise? Bad caps on power rails?
> JC
 
 
I thought of and then dismissed that assuming both channels shared a common supply, but I guess there could indeed be a separate converter for each channel. One thing I've found consistent in consumer electronics is that that lazy electros generally respond to heat and cold. Warm it up with a heat gun. Noise gone? Good chance an electro bypass is the cause.
Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au>: Oct 01 03:11PM +1000

On 1/10/2022 1:12 am, JC wrote:
 
> not familiar with the amp and not an audio guy but:
> 15Khz sounds like switching supply noise? Bad caps on power rails?
> JC
 
**Not power supply noise. The power supply is as clean as a whistle.
 
All electros have been replaced with high quality (Panasonic and
Nichicon) components.
 
The unit is pure analogue. NO digital stuff to be seen.
 
There are 25 dual OP amps (5532), a handful of bipolar transistors, 2 X
dual gate MOSFETs, four Vactrol opto-isolators and here's the big one:
27 preset pots. Every single one has been moved from factory settings by
a previous tech. Without access to factory service data, I have no
chance of restoring this thing to anything resembling normal operation.
 
I have been able to stabilise one channel (though I still have a low
level 2MHz oscillation to deal with). I was able to measure the
frequency response curve and fell confident that I can duplicate the
curve using a a 32 band, digital parametric EQ. I won't have the ability
to use the speaker feedback section, but that should be a concern, give
that the system is designed for sound reinforcement use, but will be
used in a domestic application. The speaker feedback system is designed
to protect the HF drivers under very high power operation. MY solution
should work well and will cost my client much less cash.
 
 
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au>: Oct 01 06:29PM +1000

On 1/10/2022 3:11 pm, Trevor Wilson wrote:
 
"... but that should be a concern,...."
 
Should read: "...but that should NOT be a concern,...."
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com>: Oct 01 02:24AM -0700

Trevor Wilson wrote:
 
===================
> I won't have the ability
> to use the speaker feedback section, but that should be a concern, give
> that the system is designed for sound reinforcement use,
 
** Errr - no it ain't.
 
https://www.manualslib.com/manual/915648/Meyer-Sound-833.html?page=6#manual
 
And this section is dead funny for all the wrong reasons.
 
https://www.manualslib.com/manual/915648/Meyer-Sound-833.html?page=9#manual
 
...... Phil
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to sci.electronics.repair+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

No Response to "Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 4 updates in 1 topic"

Post a Comment