sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* Blew another damn transformer on my Trane XB80 - 4 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.electronics.repair/t/f883cd09a3a0b791?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Blew another damn transformer on my Trane XB80
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.electronics.repair/t/f883cd09a3a0b791?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 4 ==
Date: Mon, Apr 11 2011 10:29 pm
From: don@manx.misty.com (Don Klipstein)

In article <90hre6FsgU1@mid.individual.net>, Phil Allison wrote:
>
><clare@snyder.on.ca>
>>
>> I have to agree with Don. DC power component on secondary OR primary,
>
>** You are both wrong.
>
>> or not connected right are the 2 most likely problems after "cheap
>> crap component"
>
>** Which is no help to the OP.

Please add helpfulness, as opposed to adding nothing but saying who
is wrong.

I chimed in explaining stuff every time. At this point that I respond
to, you are doing nothing but claiming who is wrong.

It appears to me, posting nothing but who is wrong is even lower than
my grasping-at-straws bit of any magnets on the transformer in question.

--
- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)

== 2 of 4 ==
Date: Mon, Apr 11 2011 10:51 pm
From: don@manx.misty.com (Don Klipstein)

In article <90i5ebFtiaU1@mid.individual.net>, Phil Allison wrote:
>
>"Don Klipstein the Troll"
>
>> Why would that be, in your words, "totally irrelevant"
>
>** You posted under my words and it was not relevant to them.

You snipped the relevance.

>> Why would the solution be deploying a capacitor, rather than repairing
>> the poor connection or deploying a voltage-dependent spike-absorbing
>> device such as an MOV?
>
>** A suitable MOV is also a possible solution.

So, why should I get merely "also a possible solution" after part
numbers for capacitor part numbers were digged up?

> You still have not read all my posts in this thread.

I have endured doing that, though I prefer to not waste time at
contaminating Usenet with wasting time to responding to even the posts of
yours that I don't find deserving a response.

>> So, why should we hear about problems about that from only one customer
>> blowing 3 of them?
>
>** Stop making silly stuff up - you pathetic wanker.

Do you claim that the transformer customer blew fewer than 3? Do you
claim that the disappointed transformer customer is not alone?

If so, post support to your claims!

>> Why should 1 uF protect the trannies in question ...
>
>** Already answered.
>
>( snip bullshit story)
>
>Keep on ignoring the evidence in the photos and you will never get close to
>what sort of failure has occurred.

However, it was already explained to me clearly that the photo'ed tranny
showed charring evidence of severe primary overcurrent. What do you
expect to gain from me, or against me, if I take the time to look at the
photos that this thread gave me graphic descriptions of?

>Facts are just like water off a ducks back to you - Don.

>Co you fools like you believe whatever they fucking feel like.
--
- Don (don@misty.com)

== 3 of 4 ==
Date: Tues, Apr 12 2011 12:37 am
From: "Phil Allison"

"Don Klipstein = one Looney Troll"

>>> Why would that be, in your words, "totally irrelevant"
>>
>>** You posted under my words and it was not relevant to them.
>
> You snipped the relevance.

** Blatant lie #1.

>>> Why would the solution be deploying a capacitor, rather than repairing
>>> the poor connection or deploying a voltage-dependent spike-absorbing
>>> device such as an MOV?
>>
>>** A suitable MOV is also a possible solution.
>
> So, why should I get merely "also a possible solution" after part
> numbers for capacitor part numbers were digged up?

** Wot brain dead drivel.

>> You still have not read all my posts in this thread.
>
> I have endured doing that,

** Blatant lie #2.

>>> So, why should we hear about problems about that from only one customer
>>> blowing 3 of them?
>>
>>** Stop making silly stuff up - you pathetic wanker.
>
> Do you claim that the transformer customer blew fewer than 3? Do you
> claim that the disappointed transformer customer is not alone?

** More brain dead drivel.

Don is right off with the fairies and pixies and TROLLS.

>>Keep on ignoring the evidence in the photos and you will never get close
>>to
>>what sort of failure has occurred.
>
> However, it was already explained to me clearly that the photo'ed tranny
> showed charring evidence of severe primary overcurrent.

** Nothing you have posted explains that fact at all.

Got a fucking clue how much current it takes to vaporise copper wires like
that ?

Obviously fucking not.

Facts are just like water off a duck's back to you - Don.

Cos fuckwits like you believe whatever they fucking feel like.

FOAD

- you useless, autistic, PITA turd.

.... Phil

== 4 of 4 ==
Date: Tues, Apr 12 2011 12:38 am
From: "Phil Allison"

"Don Klipstein"

** FOAD - you stupid, ridiculous arsehole.

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sci.electronics.repair"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/sci.electronics.repair?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sci.electronics.repair+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.electronics.repair/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en