Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 5 updates in 1 topic

chop <chop654@gmail.com>: Dec 30 05:00AM +1100

>>> the theft takes place.
 
>> That isn't possible with the rolling code system.
 
> "at the time the theft takes place"
 
Changes nothing.
 
>> from.
 
> You have not read the cited source or it is too difficult for you to
> understand.
 
You are just plain wrong about both.
 
> When the scheme is being run it gets a 'fresh' rolling code from an
> authorized fob and sends it to the car.
 
Wrong.
 
> Everyone seems to understand but you.
 
Wrong.
 
If it was that easy, all cars with buttonless fobs would be stolen and
that doesn't happen.
Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>: Dec 29 08:17PM +0100

On Fri, 30 Dec 2022 05:00:01 +1100, chop, better known as cantankerous
trolling senile geezer Rodent Speed, wrote:
 
<FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>
 
--
Richard addressing senile Rodent Speed:
"Shit you're thick/pathetic excuse for a troll."
MID: <ogoa38$pul$1@news.mixmin.net>
Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com>: Dec 29 11:49AM -0800

On 12/29/2022 11:17 AM, Peeler wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Dec 2022 05:00:01 +1100, chop, better known as cantankerous
> trolling senile geezer Rodent Speed, wrote:
 
I was just thinking that that must be the case.
Wade Garrett <wade@cooler.net>: Dec 30 09:42AM -0500

On 12/28/22 5:08 PM, Sergey Kubushyn wrote:
> * KSI@home KOI8 Net < > The impossible we do immediately. *
> * Las Vegas NV, USA < > Miracles require 24-hour notice. *
> ******************************************************************
 
Proximity sensor, very short range.
 
--
The reason Santa is so jolly is because he knows where all the naughty
girls live
John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com>: Dec 30 08:03AM -0800

On Wed, 28 Dec 2022 19:34:17 -0500, Phil Hobbs
>> ******************************************************************
 
>Or you could just drive a car with an actual key, like my 2012 Mustang
>convertible. ;)
 
If my car had a dead battery, I could unlock it with my real key and
boot it up from my little lithium thing. Or at least get inside, out
of the rain and snow.
 
Imagine freezing to death because your car won't let you in.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to sci.electronics.repair+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 3 topics

micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>: Dec 28 04:03PM -0500

https://www.moneyshake.com/car-finance-guides/road-safety/how-to-protect-keyless-entry-cars
Unlike standard cars where access without raising the alarm requires the
key, keyless entry models can be 'tricked' into thinking a key is
present through a transmitter and receiver device.
If your car's fob isn't stored safely, then it can be very easy for a
pair of opportune thieves to pick up the key's radio frequency signal,
without having to break into your house. Luckily, however, there are
many ways in which you can make it extremely difficult for them to do
this and protect your motor.
 
---- Except, how isthere any signal to pick up unless you are in your
home pressing the Unlock button on the fob at the same time the thief
drives by? I myself dont' bother pressing fob buttons once I've left
the car, until I want to drive away the next day.
 
https://www.wavy.com/news/local-news/norfolk/relay-devices-being-used-to-steal-locked-cars/
chop <chop654@gmail.com>: Dec 29 08:26AM +1100

> If your car's fob isn't stored safely, then it can be very easy for a
> pair of opportune thieves to pick up the key's radio frequency signal,
> without having to break into your house.
 
Bullshit.
 
 
> ---- Except, how isthere any signal to pick up unless you are in your
> home pressing the Unlock button on the fob at the same time the thief
> drives by?
 
Precisely.
 
Ed Pawlowski <esp@snet.xxx>: Dec 28 05:01PM -0500

On 12/28/2022 4:03 PM, micky wrote:
> drives by? I myself dont' bother pressing fob buttons once I've left
> the car, until I want to drive away the next day.
 
> https://www.wavy.com/news/local-news/norfolk/relay-devices-being-used-to-steal-locked-cars/
 
 
There is a constant signal on some. I don't press any button to drive
my car, just have the fob in my pocket. The car knows when I'm getting
close and if locked turns a light on the mirrors.
 
I get in the cat and push the start button in the car.
 
There is a limited distance of a few feet though. My fob is far enough
from the car it cannot be recognized. Pressing the lock or unlock
buttons works at a much greater distance
Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com>: Dec 28 02:04PM -0800

On 12/28/2022 1:03 PM, micky wrote:
> drives by? I myself dont' bother pressing fob buttons once I've left
> the car, until I want to drive away the next day.
 
> https://www.wavy.com/news/local-news/norfolk/relay-devices-being-used-to-steal-locked-cars/
 
"With keyless entry, vehicle access usually relies on a key fob.
Typically, the fob contains a chip that identifies radio signals sent by
your vehicle. These signals are only able to travel for a few feet.
 
As you enter or exit the car, the vehicle sends a radio signal to the
key fob. The fob responds by relaying its code to the vehicle. The
vehicle recognizes this code and unlocks or locks the car doors.
 
However, keyless entry isn't always fob-based. A handful of
carmakers—like Tesla and Hyundai—offer a type of keyless entry that
allows you to lock and unlock your car using an app on your smartphone.
 
These are known as digital keys or phone-as-a-key apps. Some of these
systems use your phone to send a signal directly with your car, just
like a key fob does. Others use the internet to transmit data between
your car and your phone."
Ed Pawlowski <esp@snet.xxx>: Dec 28 05:06PM -0500

On 12/28/2022 4:26 PM, chop wrote:
>> home pressing the Unlock button on the fob at the same time the thief
>> drives by?
 
> Precisely.
 
Nope. My car even has Smart Trunk (optional setting). If the car is
locked and I approach it from the rear, when about three feet away it
knows I'm there and opens the trunk for me. Nice when hands are full.
 
There is a very limited distance though. No buttons need be pressed,
the car senses the proximity of the fob.
Sergey Kubushyn <ksi@koi8.net>: Dec 28 10:08PM

> drives by? I myself dont' bother pressing fob buttons once I've left
> the car, until I want to drive away the next day.
 
> https://www.wavy.com/news/local-news/norfolk/relay-devices-being-used-to-steal-locked-cars/
 
When I'm close to my Lexus LS460L with keyfob in my pocket it greets me with
turning on the lights under rearview mirrors.
 
Then, I pull the door handle and it opens the door and unfolds the rearview
mirrors. Then, I step on the brake pedal and push the car's (not keyfob)
START button and it starts up.
 
Also, when I'm touching a button on the trunk with my keyfob in my pocket it
opens the trunk.
 
None of that happens when I have that keyfob in a copper mesh Faraday
bag/protector no matter how close I am to my car.
 
I don't remember pushing ANY keyfob button EVER for as long as I own that
car. I'm locking it when leaving by pressing a button on any door handle. It
locks all doors, folds the mirrors and activates security system when a
button on any door handle is pressed when keyfob is nearby and not in
Faraday bag. Won't do it if the keyfob is inside the car.
 
And this is true for ALL relatively modern cars with that START button. They
are ALL prone to stealing by an amplifier/receiver if keyfob is not put in a
Faraday bag. There was a video from security camera on our local Nextdoor
showing how a top-of-the-line Mercedes-Benz was stolen from our neighbor's
driveway in less than a minute, from a car stopping by and a perp going out
of that car to the moment he drove away in that Mercedes.
 
Please, don't spread that BS about no signal unless a keyfob button is
pressed. It is simply false.
 
---
******************************************************************
* KSI@home KOI8 Net < > The impossible we do immediately. *
* Las Vegas NV, USA < > Miracles require 24-hour notice. *
******************************************************************
Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>: Dec 28 11:11PM +0100

"Rod Speed is an entirely modern phenomenon. Essentially, Rod Speed
is an insecure and worthless individual who has discovered he can
enhance his own self-esteem in his own eyes by playing "the big, hard
man" on the InterNet."
 
https://www.pcreview.co.uk/threads/rod-speed-faq.2973853/
 
--
David Plowman about senile Rodent Speed's trolling:
"Wodney is doing a lot of morphing these days. Must be even more desperate
than usual for attention."
MID: <59a60da1d9dave@davenoise.co.uk>
TTman <kraken.sankey@gmail.com>: Dec 28 10:13PM

> * KSI@home KOI8 Net < > The impossible we do immediately. *
> * Las Vegas NV, USA < > Miracles require 24-hour notice. *
> ******************************************************************
Anyone with more than a couple of brain cells knows about keys in a
faraday cage.And probably all in this group...
 
 
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>: Dec 28 05:19PM -0500

In alt.home.repair, on Wed, 28 Dec 2022 17:06:20 -0500, Ed Pawlowski
>knows I'm there and opens the trunk for me. Nice when hands are full.
 
>There is a very limited distance though. No buttons need be pressed,
>the car senses the proximity of the fob.
 
The guy in NextDoor who raised t his subject replied to me: "No. Push
button cars are in constant communication with the key fob when close
enough for signal. Once the signal is amplified, the device they are
using can unlock the car. Once inside, they can insert another device
into the ODB port which reprograms the key encryption to whatever they
like."
 
He envisions being close enough to the fob when the fob is in the house
but near the door and everyone is asleep, then unlocking and stealing
the whole car. Possible?
micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>: Dec 28 05:27PM -0500

In alt.home.repair, on Wed, 28 Dec 2022 22:08:22 -0000 (UTC), Sergey
>of that car to the moment he drove away in that Mercedes.
 
>Please, don't spread that BS about no signal unless a keyfob button is
>pressed. It is simply false.
 
Well, it's not *simply* false. it's false in the case of cars some,
like the guy on NextDoor, describe cryptically as "pushbutton" cars.
My car's fob and the car have lots of pushbuttons too.
 
Last Feb to June I rented a car that was only a year old and I've
already forgotten how unlocking the door worked, but it had a little
add-on keypad and 4 numbers had to be entered to start the car. So that
would defeat this method of stealing cars. But I know American cars, or
non-rental cars, don't have such things.
 
It seems almost like it's worth not buying a car like this. Even if you
live in the Yukon, on a farm 20 miles from town, where thieves never go,
if you go to town and don't use the Faraday bag or something, and
someone likes the car, can't he see the owner get out of it, follow him
and amplify the signal and while the owner is walking one way, walk the
other and steal the car?
chop <chop654@gmail.com>: Dec 29 09:36AM +1100

>> the car, until I want to drive away the next day.
 
>> https://www.wavy.com/news/local-news/norfolk/relay-devices-being-used-to-steal-locked-cars/
 
> There is a constant signal on some.
 
Don't buy that. The battery wouldn't last very long if that was the case.
 
> I don't press any button to drive my car, just have the fob in my
> pocket.
 
That doesn't mean that there is a constant signal.
 
chop <chop654@gmail.com>: Dec 29 09:43AM +1100

> button cars are in constant communication with the key fob when close
> enough for signal. Once the signal is amplified, the device they are
> using can unlock the car.
 
Not with the best rolling code systems.
 
> Once inside, they can insert another device
> into the ODB port which reprograms the key encryption to whatever they
> like."
 
That's wrong too.
 
> He envisions being close enough to the fob when the fob is in the house
> but near the door and everyone is asleep, then unlocking and stealing
> the whole car. Possible?
 
Nope, not with the best rolling code systems.
chop <chop654@gmail.com>: Dec 29 09:54AM +1100

> someone likes the car, can't he see the owner get out of it, follow him
> and amplify the signal and while the owner is walking one way, walk the
> other and steal the car?
 
Nope, not with the best keyless systems.
John Larkin <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com>: Dec 28 03:32PM -0800

On Wed, 28 Dec 2022 22:08:22 -0000 (UTC), Sergey Kubushyn
>* KSI@home KOI8 Net < > The impossible we do immediately. *
>* Las Vegas NV, USA < > Miracles require 24-hour notice. *
>******************************************************************
 
When we get home, our keys go in a Danish Butter Cookie can. Those are
pretty good shields.
 
https://www.dropbox.com/s/30c6aesh4tzjg56/Z496_Can.jpg?raw=1
 
https://www.dropbox.com/s/cuxn5r7yzenb8m2/Z496_Out.jpg?raw=1
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal): Dec 28 11:47PM

>home pressing the Unlock button on the fob at the same time the thief
>drives by? I myself dont' bother pressing fob buttons once I've left
>the car, until I want to drive away the next day.
 
The key fob and the vehicle routinely "ping" each other when
in range. This is what allows mere possession of the key
to allow one to unlock the trunk, or fuel filler cover without
any button push on the remote.
 
The evesdropper can simply "overhear" the ping and use the data
to capture the necessary bits of the protocol.
Sergey Kubushyn <ksi@koi8.net>: Dec 29 12:20AM

> pretty good shields.
 
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/30c6aesh4tzjg56/Z496_Can.jpg?raw=1
 
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/cuxn5r7yzenb8m2/Z496_Out.jpg?raw=1
 
Yep. But those bags have their use too -- you car can be stolen when you
e.g. park it at a grocery store and come inside. The good practice is to put
the keyfob in a Faraday cage protection bag every time you leave it. Those
are not big boxes and easily fit in one's pocket. Something like this:
 
https://www.amazon.com/Protector-Blocking-Double-Layers-Shielding-Anti-Theft/dp/B0B4DCLY87
 
---
******************************************************************
* KSI@home KOI8 Net < > The impossible we do immediately. *
* Las Vegas NV, USA < > Miracles require 24-hour notice. *
******************************************************************
Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net>: Dec 28 07:34PM -0500

Sergey Kubushyn wrote:
> * KSI@home KOI8 Net < > The impossible we do immediately. *
> * Las Vegas NV, USA < > Miracles require 24-hour notice. *
> ******************************************************************
 
Or you could just drive a car with an actual key, like my 2012 Mustang
convertible. ;)
 
Cheers
 
Phil Hobbs
(And yes, it's pointless locking a convertible--if only I could convince
my insurance company.) ;)
 
--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
 
http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com
Ed Pawlowski <esp@snet.xxx>: Dec 28 07:43PM -0500

On 12/28/2022 5:36 PM, chop wrote:
 
> Don't buy that. The battery wouldn't last very long if that was the case.
 
>> I don't press any button to drive my car, just have the fob in my pocket.
 
> That doesn't mean that there is a constant signal.
 
What then? it is constantly recognizable by the car, that is what matters.
John Larkin <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com>: Dec 28 05:02PM -0800

On Thu, 29 Dec 2022 00:20:05 -0000 (UTC), Sergey Kubushyn
>e.g. park it at a grocery store and come inside. The good practice is to put
>the keyfob in a Faraday cage protection bag every time you leave it. Those
>are not big boxes and easily fit in one's pocket. Something like this:
 
We have old fashioned cars with RF fobs that transmit when the button
is pushed. I don't think the RF relay cheat works with them.
chop <chop654@gmail.com>: Dec 29 01:52PM +1100

On Thu, 29 Dec 2022 10:47:07 +1100, Scott Lurndal <scott@slp53.sl.home>
wrote:
 
> any button push on the remote.
 
> The evesdropper can simply "overhear" the ping and use the data
> to capture the necessary bits of the protocol.
 
Not with a rolling code system.
chop <chop654@gmail.com>: Dec 29 01:56PM +1100

>> That doesn't mean that there is a constant signal.
 
> What then? it is constantly recognizable by the car, that is what
> matters.
 
What matters is that with a rolling code system, it is pointless listening
to the traffic and repeating it try to fool the car and steal it.
chop <chop654@gmail.com>: Dec 29 02:00PM +1100

On Thu, 29 Dec 2022 12:02:20 +1100, John Larkin
>> are not big boxes and easily fit in one's pocket. Something like this:
 
> We have old fashioned cars with RF fobs that transmit when the button
> is pushed. I don't think the RF relay cheat works with them.
 
I know that it doesn't. And even recording what happens when the
owner locks the car doesn't work with a rolling code system.
ehsjr <ehsjr@verizon.net>: Dec 28 06:23PM -0500

On 12/28/2022 10:56 AM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
> enough. It just remained to screw the finial back on, with a dab of
> varnish in its threads.
 
> Job done - cost nil.
 
Neat! Congratulations on the "impossible" repair.
I suppose many of us have kinked telescoping antennas.
I never heard of one being repaired before - replaced yes,
un-kinked no. Thanks for posting that. :-)
Ed
Andrew Smallshaw <andrews@sdf.org>: Dec 28 05:20PM


> Most plugs are for 'solid' cable, to repair patch cables you need to get the
> type of plugs for 'stranded' cable, I think there is also a type of plug that
> copes with both ...
 
Most _plugs_ are for stranded cable, they are intended for loose
flexes (patch cables) between equipment and between equipment and
fixed wiring (i.e. wall socket or patch panel). Most _sockets_
are for solid cable, intending for the fixed wiring through ducts,
walls, ceiling etc where the flexibility of stranded cable isn't
needed. Solid cable is simply a bit too stiff for patch cables,
any bending forces translate through to the contact (even through
the strain relief) and I've found they work loose in short order.
 
More common is sockets that can accept either solid or stranded
cable. Solid is to be preferred for fixed wiring that is expected
to make up the bulk of a run, since it has slightly lower losses
than stranded, although in my home network I use stranded exclusively.
If I had installed it all in one go I would probably have bought
a 100m or 305m reel of solid, but the fixed wiring has gone in over
time so it's a lower immediate cost to buy a 10, 20 or 30m patch
lead and lop the ends off for the bare cable. But then the longest
run in my home is 28m, and even that follows a very circuitous
route, well short of the 100m limit so a little additional loss is
acceptable.
 
Also while I'm posting I'll just pick up a terminological note
elsethread. It's a crossed or crossover cable in a networking
context, never rolled or rollover. The latter is generally construed
to mean a cable wired 1-8, 2-7 etc. Used a lot in serial (RS232)
over twisted pair which these days is something of a niche thing
in a home environment, but still very widespread in commercial and
industrial settings.
 
--
Andrew Smallshaw
andrews@sdf.org
Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk>: Dec 28 06:24PM

Andrew Smallshaw wrote:
 
> Most _plugs_ are for stranded cable [...] Most _sockets_
> are for solid cable
 
You're quite right, not sure what I was thinking ...
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to sci.electronics.repair+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 3 updates in 2 topics

liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham): Dec 28 03:56PM

I was given a portable receiver with a damaged telescopic aerial, the
set had been dropped and one section of the aerial had become slightly
buckled. and wouldn't telescope inwards. I first thought it would have
to be either left protruding or written off and replaced with the
nearest substitute I could find, but later examinatuion suggested it
might be repairable.
 
The first step was to remove the finial; this had been screwed on
tightly and locked with some sort of compound. By gripping the finial
in a collet chuck on a lathe and the top section of the rod with a
strong pair of water pump pliers, I was able to revolve the chuck by
hand and unscrew the finial.
 
The next step was to find a collet that was a reasonable fit over the
damaged section. By screwing up and unscrewing the chuck ring I was
able to make the collet gently pinch the damaged area down onto the next
rod inside it - gradually working my way along and back until all the
creases had been removed.
 
Although the result didn't look perfect, it slid in and out easily
enough. It just remained to screw the finial back on, with a dab of
varnish in its threads.
 
Job done - cost nil.
 
--
~ Liz Tuddenham ~
(Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
www.poppyrecords.co.uk
micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>: Dec 27 05:10PM -0500

In alt.home.repair, on Mon, 26 Dec 2022 15:15:55 -0700, Ken Blake
>whether (and if so, how) I could tell whether the connections were
>568A or 568B. I basically wanted to know that so I could tell whether
>an old cable I might have lying around is a crossover cable.
 
You don't have to know which format they are to know if they are
crossover. Hold both ends next to each other and see if the colors are
in the same order. If they're not, it's crossover. If they are, it's
not.
Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com>: Dec 28 07:23AM -0700

On Tue, 27 Dec 2022 17:10:44 -0500, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>
wrote:
 
>crossover. Hold both ends next to each other and see if the colors are
>in the same order. If they're not, it's crossover. If they are, it's
>not.
 
Yes, as others have said. Thanks. I hadn't realized they were
transparent.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to sci.electronics.repair+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 16 updates in 1 topic

Zaidy036 <Zaidy036@air.isp.spam>: Dec 26 12:02PM -0500

On 12/19/2022 12:09 PM, micky wrote:
> USB conector?
 
> **One facing the front, one to the right of that, and one mounted a foot
> or two away, around the corner of the house, facing the side yard.
Why use wired when Wi-Fi cameras are available? Google "Wi-Fi outdoor
camera". Add "Solar" for more. Battery replacement time depends on use.
If you have one outside light nearby can provide power from it.
 
Some info here:
https://www.bestbuy.com/discover-learn/top-8-things-to-know-about-solar-powered-security-cameras/pcmcat1637608496025
Char Jackson <none@none.invalid>: Dec 26 11:56AM -0600


>The T368A and T368B thing is for rolled or straight-thru cabling.
 
If both ends of a cable are 568A, or if both ends are 568B, it's a
straight-through cable. If one end of a cable is 568A and the other end
is 568B, it's a crossover cable, what you call rolled, below.
 
Crossover cables are very rarely needed these days. All of mine are long
gone. What's important is to pick a wiring standard and stick with it. I
use 568B, but that's just personal preference and momentum.
 
https://www.truecable.com/blogs/cable-academy/t568a-vs-t568b
 
 
Char Jackson <none@none.invalid>: Dec 26 12:06PM -0600

On Mon, 26 Dec 2022 06:29:32 +0000, Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk>
wrote:
 
>round the back, and something stops working ... if you can retuerminate it with
>a new plug, sure but patch cables are cheap, stuff not working is frequently
>expensive ...
 
I suppose it could be annoying if a connection comes loose, but it's not
like it causes any damage. Just push the plug in and carry on, right? I
get your point, though. One of these years I'll probably replace my
barbless cables (or more likely just snip the connector and crimp a new
one). They're not causing any problems, though, so it could be a while.
Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com>: Dec 26 02:25PM -0700

On Mon, 26 Dec 2022 11:56:48 -0600, Char Jackson <none@none.invalid>
wrote:
 
>>uses a rolled cable (only if both ends are limited to 10/100BT NICs).
>>GbE equipment has MDI/MDIX which can deal with either straight or
>>rolled cabling.
 
I had never heard of 568A or 568B before. Short of taking it apart,
is it possible to tell which connector it is?
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal): Dec 26 09:34PM

>>>rolled cabling.
 
>I had never heard of 568A or 568B before. Short of taking it apart,
>is it possible to tell which connector it is?
 
It's the same connector (RJ-45) for both. 568A/568B are the standards
for which wire goes to which contact in the (usually) female connector.
 
Cables (with male connectors) are typically wired straight through or
crossover (rare now).
Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com>: Dec 26 03:15PM -0700

On Mon, 26 Dec 2022 21:34:34 GMT, scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal)
wrote:
 
 
>>I had never heard of 568A or 568B before. Short of taking it apart,
>>is it possible to tell which connector it is?
 
>It's the same connector (RJ-45) for both.
 
Yes, I know. I guess my question wasn't clear.
 
 
> 568A/568B are the standards
>for which wire goes to which contact in the (usually) female connector.
 
Yes, I understood that from Char's post,
 
>(usually) female connector.
 
I thought (especially for crossover cable) that it was especially
pertinent to male connectors.
 
 
>Cables (with male connectors) are typically wired straight through or
>crossover (rare now).
 
 
Yes, I know. What I didn't know was that a crossover cable is one that
is connected 568A at one end and 568B at the other. I was asking
whether (and if so, how) I could tell whether the connections were
568A or 568B. I basically wanted to know that so I could tell whether
an old cable I might have lying around is a crossover cable.
"Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>: Dec 26 11:46PM +0100

On 2022-12-26 19:06, Char Jackson wrote:
> get your point, though. One of these years I'll probably replace my
> barbless cables (or more likely just snip the connector and crimp a new
> one). They're not causing any problems, though, so it could be a while.
 
I have one such cable. It is perfect. it is used for temporary
connection to my laptop, and being able to pull it off easily is a plus :-D
 
--
Cheers, Carlos.
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal): Dec 26 11:08PM

scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal): Dec 26 11:10PM

>whether (and if so, how) I could tell whether the connections were
>568A or 568B. I basically wanted to know that so I could tell whether
>an old cable I might have lying around is a crossover cable.
 
You can (a) look at the wire colors in the cable through the
transparent connector and match them to the chart, or
(b) plug the cable into a cat5 cable tester.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethernet_crossover_cable
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANSI/TIA-568#T568A_and_T568B_termination
 
Assuming that whomever made the connector followed the wiring T568 suggestions.
Paul <nospam@needed.invalid>: Dec 26 06:27PM -0500

On 12/26/2022 5:15 PM, Ken Blake wrote:
> whether (and if so, how) I could tell whether the connections were
> 568A or 568B. I basically wanted to know that so I could tell whether
> an old cable I might have lying around is a crossover cable.
 
Ohmmeter.
 
Check whether 1,2 on one end, goes to 1,2 on the other end.
Or, whether 1,2 on one end, goes to 3,6 on the other end.
 
The first is straight thru.
 
The second is crossover.
 
Of the eight wires (four twisted pairs), four of the wires
are "legacy" material. 1,2 and 3,6 pairs were used on 10/100BT
for the wiring. The remaining wires would not be doing anything.
 
On the legacy stuff, a TX pair was wired to an RX pair.
An RX pair was wires to a TX pair. That was the four wires.
 
Whereas GbE is bidirectional on eight wires total.
 
https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/132486/how-does-bidirectional-transmission-on-gigabit-ethernet-work
 
And the waveform on GbE is "beautiful". It's PAM5.
It would look even nicer, if we could see the PAM5
eye diagram on the Tektronix digital scope. Very colorful.
 
https://www.edn.com/wp-content/uploads/media-1163595-134711-tmw03-04f2fig1.gif
 
( https://www.edn.com/what-pam5-means-to-you/ )
 
Paul
Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com>: Dec 26 05:12PM -0700

On Mon, 26 Dec 2022 23:10:11 GMT, scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal)
wrote:
 
 
>You can (a) look at the wire colors in the cable through the
> transparent connector and match them to the chart, or
> (b) plug the cable into a cat5 cable tester.
 
 
Actually, a few minutes ago, I looked the one cable that I could
easily find. Yes the connector was transparent and yes I could see
that they were the same so it wasn't a crossover cable.
 
But are the connectors always transparent? My memory might be wrong,
but I didn't think so.
Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com>: Dec 26 05:14PM -0700

On Mon, 26 Dec 2022 18:27:33 -0500, Paul <nospam@needed.invalid>
wrote:
 
>Or, whether 1,2 on one end, goes to 3,6 on the other end.
 
>The first is straight thru.
 
>The second is crossover.
 
Thanks, but I don't think I need to do that. See the other reply I'm
about to send.
Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com>: Dec 26 05:18PM -0700

On Mon, 26 Dec 2022 17:12:15 -0700, Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com>
wrote:
 
>that they were the same so it wasn't a crossover cable.
 
>But are the connectors always transparent? My memory might be wrong,
>but I didn't think so.
 
 
My memory is apparently wrong. It just occurred to me that it would be
very easy to look at the cables coming into my router.
 
Yes, the ends of all four of those connectors are *all* transparent.
What must have confused me is the part of the connector next to that
end transparent part is opaque, colored the same as the cable itself.
Char Jackson <none@none.invalid>: Dec 26 09:11PM -0600

>> 568A or 568B. I basically wanted to know that so I could tell whether
>> an old cable I might have lying around is a crossover cable.
 
>Ohmmeter.
 
Ugh! Just do a visual check. Put the two cable ends side by side. If the
colors match, pin for pin, it's straight through. If not, it's most
likely a crossover, but could also be miswired (not likely). You can use
the colored pictures found online, as well.
 
 
Char Jackson <none@none.invalid>: Dec 26 09:21PM -0600

On Mon, 26 Dec 2022 21:34:34 GMT, scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal)
wrote:
 
 
>>I had never heard of 568A or 568B before. Short of taking it apart,
>>is it possible to tell which connector it is?
 
>It's the same connector (RJ-45) for both.
 
AKA 8p8c
 
>568A/568B are the standards
>for which wire goes to which contact
 
Agreed.
 
>in the (usually) female connector.
 
Not sure what you're saying there. Gender has nothing to do with it. The
two wiring standards (568A & 568B) apply equally to both genders,
although patch panels, which are almost always female, are normally
wired straight. The crossover role, if needed, is normally left for the
patch cable, the link between the patch panel and the piece of
equipment.
 
>Cables (with male connectors) are typically wired straight through
 
Right, using either 568A or 568B cable/pin assignment.
 
>or crossover (rare now).
 
Agreed.
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal): Dec 27 04:15PM

>It would look even nicer, if we could see the PAM5
>eye diagram on the Tektronix digital scope. Very colorful.
 
>https://www.edn.com/wp-content/uploads/media-1163595-134711-tmw03-04f2fig1.gif
 
You ought to see the eye diagram for 400Gbe and 800Gbe with PAM4.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to sci.electronics.repair+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 2 updates in 1 topic

Bill Gill <billnews2@cox.net>: Dec 26 08:02AM -0600

On 12/25/2022 12:34 PM, micky wrote:
> keep pushing until it works. The speaker switch OTOH has a spring that
> pushes it out, past its sweet spot, so now it's hard to get to connect
> at all.
Not a problem. There are 2 different problems that you may be talking
about. The difference in phase of the RF signal will have no effect.
The RF part of the signal is taken out in the receiver and only the
audio is there to be affected by the location of the 2. And that will
have no effect, because the wavelength of audio signals is over 9 miles
for the high end (20 kHz) frequency and goes up from there as the
frequency goes down. There will not be enough difference to have
any effect.
 
And it isn't even April 1.
 
Bill
micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>: Dec 26 11:01AM -0500

In alt.home.repair, on Mon, 26 Dec 2022 14:49:54 +0200,
>audio inverting stages) the radio may produce opposite phase audio on
>FM. One might have the local oscillator (LO) below the received
>frequency (RF), while in the other the LO is above the RF frequency.
 
Thanks everyone. Clive raised points that I had thought of -- that was
reassuring -- and everyone else gave me plenty of information to think
about.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to sci.electronics.repair+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 3 topics

micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>: Dec 25 01:34PM -0500

Technical qustion about wave valleys and troughs and if two radio
playing the same station will be in phase wrt all frequencies, or if
some will cancel out?
 
And why is it low frequencies are famous for cancelling out when out of
phase when high frequencies are just as likely, 0.5, I think, to cancel
each other out?
 
Can I just turn off one radio and turn it on again so that the total
odds over both times have increased that by the second time the radios
will be in phase?
 
 
I have a radio and tv in one bathroom but neither in the other, which is
smaller and adjoins the bedroom. Sometimes I want to hear the radio
which only gets 'loud' if you are in the same room. I can hear it from
the bathroom but not enough to understand what is said.
 
I have another table radio, KLM, expensive, that I had for about 33
years when the speaker switch started to fail**, and I turn that one on
too, to the same station, also at maximum volume, and I can hear in the
bathroom just fine, but I wonder if some frequencies are out of phase
from one radio to the other, cancelling each other, and I'm not hearing
them.
 
It seems to me, if one radio is farther from the transmitting antenna,
by 1/2 wave length, the speakers in the two radios will always be going
in the opposite direction from each other. Maybe.
 
In my case, the radios are one above the other, so the distance from the
xmtr is very similar. But what about within the radio, when the
heterodyning frequency starts. What if it starts have a cycle after the
first radio?
 
 
 
**So I bought the second radio. The first one has a pushbutton switch
meant to connect/disconnect a wooden-cabinet stereo speaker, which I
have no room for, and unless I get the switch just right, no sound comes
out at all. (even the on/off momementary contact switch no longer works
well, after only 33 years, maybe using it at most 6 times a day, so that
6x365x33=66,000 times. Aren't switches supposed to last into the
millions of times? --- It's failing isn't nearly as bad, because I just
keep pushing until it works. The speaker switch OTOH has a spring that
pushes it out, past its sweet spot, so now it's hard to get to connect
at all.
micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>: Dec 25 04:12PM -0500

sci.electronics.design added.
 
Technical qustion about wave valleys and troughs and if two radio
playing the same station will be in phase wrt all frequencies, or if
some will cancel out?
 
And why is it low frequencies are famous for cancelling out when out of
phase when high frequencies are just as likely, 0.5, I think, to cancel
each other out?
 
Can I just turn off one radio for a few seconds and turn it on again so
that the total odds over both times have increased that by the second
time the radios will be in phase?
 
 
I have a radio and tv in one bathroom but neither in the other, which is
smaller and adjoins the bedroom. Sometimes I want to hear the radio
which only gets 'loud' if you are in the same room. I can hear it from
the bathroom but not enough to understand what is said.
 
I have another table radio, KLM, expensive, that I had for about 33
years when the speaker switch started to fail**, and I turn that one on
too, to the same station, also at maximum volume, and I can hear in the
bathroom just fine, but I wonder if some frequencies are out of phase
from one radio to the other, cancelling each other, and I'm not hearing
them.
 
It seems to me, if one radio is farther from the transmitting antenna,
by 1/2 wave length, the speakers in the two radios will always be going
in the opposite direction from each other. Maybe.
 
In my case, the radios are one above the other, so the distance from the
xmtr is very similar. But what about within the radio, when the
heterodyning frequency starts. What if it starts have a cycle after the
first radio?
 
 
 
**So I bought the second radio. The first one has a pushbutton switch
meant to connect/disconnect a wooden-cabinet stereo speaker, which I
have no room for, and unless I get the switch just right, no sound comes
out at all. (even the on/off momementary contact switch no longer works
well, after only 33 years, maybe using it at most 6 times a day, so that
6x365x33=66,000 times. Aren't switches supposed to last into the
millions of times? --- It's failing isn't nearly as bad, because I just
keep pushing until it works. The speaker switch OTOH has a spring that
pushes it out, past its sweet spot, so now it's hard to get to connect
at all.
Ed Cryer <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk>: Dec 25 09:13PM

micky wrote:
> keep pushing until it works. The speaker switch OTOH has a spring that
> pushes it out, past its sweet spot, so now it's hard to get to connect
> at all.
 
Let's rule out Hertzian waves from Net speeds to begin with. If you have
an FM radio and a Wifi radio in the same room, there'll be a very
noticeable discrepancy.
This phenomenon is so well known that I don't need linger on the cause.
 
Added to that, you may have two wifi radios together, but processed by
different hardware/ software. And here again the cause needs no explanation.
 
Your second radio with the dodgy on/off button doesn't even contribute
to the mix; and it won't do so until it produces some output sound. A
faulty switch is a different problem from an echoing, out-of-sync
cacophony of sound.
 
Ed
Ed Cryer <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk>: Dec 25 09:29PM

Ed Cryer wrote:
> faulty switch is a different problem from an echoing, out-of-sync
> cacophony of sound.
 
> Ed
 
My best radio is in my bathroom. I didn't put it there; it was in place
when I moved in; it comes through the vent fan which switches on with
the room switch.
I've been trying to figure out for years which station it's tuned to.
Mostly it seems classical, like a choir singing, but now and again it
has a bom-da-da-bom rhythm of rock music. I once heard it playing
Werewolves of London.
 
If you solve your problem, let me know. I'd love to find out which
station my bathroom is tuned into.
 
Ed
John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com>: Dec 25 01:31PM -0800

On Sun, 25 Dec 2022 16:12:19 -0500, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>
wrote:
 
 
>Can I just turn off one radio for a few seconds and turn it on again so
>that the total odds over both times have increased that by the second
>time the radios will be in phase?
 
Phase is probably constant for each radio, but random between
different types.
 
Measure it.
 
Sound waves are short so you'd have to be equidistant from both
speakers, without wall reflections, to have phasing mean much.
 
 
 
>keep pushing until it works. The speaker switch OTOH has a spring that
>pushes it out, past its sweet spot, so now it's hard to get to connect
>at all.
 
Try some contact cleaner.
micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>: Dec 25 05:55PM -0500

In alt.home.repair, on Sun, 25 Dec 2022 16:56:38 -0500, Rachelle
>> some will cancel out?
 
>Are the radios powered by the same 120v phase or on opposite legs (180
>degree out-of-phase)?
 
Yes, plugged into the same outlet.
 
Both are traditional over-the-air AM-FM radios, usually using FM. (One
has bluetooth but it's not in use. )
 
(To other poster, The radio with the bad speaker switch works well if
the switch stops in the right spot, and sometimes it will stay that way
for days. No access for contact cleaner at the moment.
rbowman <bowman@montana.com>: Dec 26 12:12AM

On Sun, 25 Dec 2022 21:29:49 +0000, Ed Cryer wrote:
 
 
> If you solve your problem, let me know. I'd love to find out which
> station my bathroom is tuned into.
 
Don't you have another radio? It would be trivial to scan the frequencies
until you get a match. Doesn't the UK require broadcast stations to
periodically identify themselves?
 
https://www.transmissionzero.co.uk/radio/london-pirate-radio/
 
Perhaps it's a pirate with eclectic taste. The local university has a low
power FM station that's all over the map depending on who the DJ is for
the slot.
dplatt@coop.radagast.org (Dave Platt): Dec 25 09:54PM -0800

In article <m3fhqhpa8r1b700ol2pk2j6ru33aol4r47@4ax.com>,
 
>Technical qustion about wave valleys and troughs and if two radio
>playing the same station will be in phase wrt all frequencies, or if
>some will cancel out?
 
To a very close approximation, the movement of their speaker cones
will be in phase (assuming that the radios are of identical design).
The speed of light (and radio) is fast enough that you need a lot of
separation between two identical radios, before the outputs will
develop a perceptible phase shift.
 
The in-phase-vs-out-of-phase behavior at the actual listening location,
and its effect on specific frequencies, is dominated by the distance
from each speaker cone to the listener's ear. Since sound moves at only
about 1 foot per millisecond, changing the distances by an inch or two can
make a big difference in which frequencies cancel and which ones reinforce.
 
>And why is it low frequencies are famous for cancelling out when out of
>phase when high frequencies are just as likely, 0.5, I think, to cancel
>each other out?
 
They do. However, you're less likely to notice it, for a number of
reasons.
 
At the higher frequencies, our ears (and brains) are constantly
dealing with the reinforcement and cancellation of different
frequencies, as the sound waves bounce off of floors and ceilings and
create all sorts of "multipath" interference which changes every time
we move a few inches. This happens even for a single sound source
(mono radio, person speaking, etc.). Our brains have evolved to
perceive sound sources even in the face of this sort of multipath
interference and the resulting "comb filter" effect. So, we just
don't notice it consciously when it's happening. You can see the
effect on a spectrogram (pick up the REW software and a good
microphone if you want to experiment).
 
>Can I just turn off one radio for a few seconds and turn it on again so
>that the total odds over both times have increased that by the second
>time the radios will be in phase?
 
"In phase" where and at what frequencies? At the speaker cones? At
your current listening position? At the position you'll be in ten
seconds, after you move your head a bit?
 
>bathroom just fine, but I wonder if some frequencies are out of phase
>from one radio to the other, cancelling each other, and I'm not hearing
>them.
 
Look at it this way. At a frequency of 1000 Hz (roughly in the middle
of the speech-frequency range), a full wave of the sound is about a
foot long (in air). If you stand between the two radios, and then
move three inches one way or the other, you'll increase one path
length by a quarter-wavelength and reduce the other by a
quarter-wavelength, and thus change the timing difference by half
a wavelength. You'll go from "reinforcement" to "cancellation" (or
vice versa) at this one frequency, just by making this simple little
movement of your head.
 
At higher frequencies, moving as little as an inch has this same
effect. At lower frequencies, yoh have to move further to change
cancellation into reinforcement.
 
As you move, you're probably also going to be changing the collection of
reflective paths from each radio to your head, and these changes will
also alter the cancellations and reinforcements. "Multipath" can be
extremely complicated.
 
>It seems to me, if one radio is farther from the transmitting antenna,
>by 1/2 wave length, the speakers in the two radios will always be going
>in the opposite direction from each other. Maybe.
 
No, that's too simple a model of how the sound-in-air is related to the
signal-by-radio. It doesn't really work that way.
 
In FM radio, the position of the speaker cone (pushed towards you or
pulled back to you) depends on the frequency of the RF (above or below
the nominal FM carrier frequency), *not* on the phase of the RF at any
given instant. Delaying the RF by a few cycles will result in only a
negligible delay in the phase of the speaker cone
motion... approximately 1 nanosecond of timing change per foot.
 
AM detection works somewhat similarly, in that the amplitude of the
signal fed to the speaker is proportional to the _envelope_ of the
RF signal, and not to its instantaneous value or phase.
 
So, in both AM and FM, the amount of phase shift in the speaker-cone
output caused by moving the radio towards, or away from the transmitter
is tiny. The effect of changing the length of the sound path (in air)
between radio and listener are far, far larger.
 
(Move the radio 1 foot closer to the transmitter, and you change the
speaker-cone timing by at most a nanosecond or so. At the same time,
you change the speaker-cone-to-ear sound travel timing by as much as
a millisecond. That's a million-to-one difference! Radio fast, sound
slow.)
 
>xmtr is very similar. But what about within the radio, when the
>heterodyning frequency starts. What if it starts have a cycle after the
>first radio?
 
Essentially irrelevant, once the heterodyned IF signal hits the
detector (FM detector such as a ratio or quadrature detector, or an AM
envelope or product detector). At this point, the heterodyned IF
signal per se ceases to exist, and we start looking at an audio signal
which is based on a longer-term "measurement" of the IF (its envelope,
or its frequency deviation from nominal center) which doesn't depend
significantly on the phase of the IF or the original RF.
 
>well, after only 33 years, maybe using it at most 6 times a day, so that
>6x365x33=66,000 times. Aren't switches supposed to last into the
>millions of times?
 
Switches and relays are (in my experience) often the weakest point in
radios and etc. The contacts wear out or bend, the contacts get dirty or
contaminated (tobacco and cannabis smoke leave a nasty, insulating tar),
the plastic switch body wears out, etc.
 
Yes, they may be "supposed to" last for hundreds of thousands, or even
millions of cycles, *if* the manufacturer chose a really good switch
and if it's been kept clean. Often, neither of these is the case.
OEMs often "economize" on such things to save a few cents per unit.
If it lasts until after the warranty expires... for many brands,
that's plenty good enough.
 
I've gotten quite a few radios and so forth "back from the dead" by giving
switches a good cleaning, or (when necessary) replacing them.
Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk>: Dec 26 09:30AM

On 25/12/2022 22:55, micky wrote:
 
>> Are the radios powered by the same 120v phase or on opposite legs (180
>> degree out-of-phase)?
 
> Yes, plugged into the same outlet.
 
The radio will convert it to DC anyway so that doesn't matter.
 
> Both are traditional over-the-air AM-FM radios, usually using FM. (One
> has bluetooth but it's not in use. )
 
Chances are one will be a few hundred ns time shifted relative to the
other since the amplifiers in each stage of detection are unlikely to
have exactly the same delay or frequency phase response.
 
Propagation of sound waves in the room will have a much larger effect on
what you hear. Positioning of the speakers relative to hard surfaces.
 
> (To other poster, The radio with the bad speaker switch works well if
> the switch stops in the right spot, and sometimes it will stay that way
> for days. No access for contact cleaner at the moment.
 
If you really want massive flanging effects try two different digital
radios or SDR decoders within earshot. The difference in delays then can
be fractions of a second or seconds when compared to an FM radio.
 
DAB is completely useless in an emergency situation unless you have a
shed load of batteries. Uses a set every 8 hours of run time. A decent
FM radio will run for a week or more on just one set of batteries.
 
--
Regards,
Martin Brown
Clive Arthur <clive@nowaytoday.co.uk>: Dec 26 10:48AM

On 25/12/2022 22:55, micky wrote:
 
> (To other poster, The radio with the bad speaker switch works well if
> the switch stops in the right spot, and sometimes it will stay that way
> for days. No access for contact cleaner at the moment.
 
I would expect two radios of the same make and model to be in phase, but
different radios will have different amplifier designs and speaker
arrangements which will likely give phase differences at different
frequencies. Plus it is possible that the two loudspeakers are simply
connected in opposite polarity anyway.
 
--
Cheers
Clive
upsidedown@downunder.com: Dec 26 02:49PM +0200

On Sun, 25 Dec 2022 17:55:35 -0500, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>
wrote:
 
 
>Both are traditional over-the-air AM-FM radios, usually using FM.
 
Even if two radios produce in phase audio on AM (with equal number of
audio inverting stages) the radio may produce opposite phase audio on
FM. One might have the local oscillator (LO) below the received
frequency (RF), while in the other the LO is above the RF frequency.
"hondgm@yahoo.com" <hondgm@yahoo.com>: Dec 25 11:42AM -0800

> I have a microwave from the mid 2000s that failed on me. It uses basic circuitry: transformer, diode, cap, magnetron....not an inverter type or anything fancy like that. One morning it seemed to mostly work, but the output rapidly dropped over a few minutes. No bang, no smoke. Just stopped heating.
 
> Everything tests ok, the transformer, diode, cap, even the magnetron resistance measurements are "good". I know there's about 10A to the filament with indirect testing, and I know the capacitor has near 2kV on it right after running the unit and unplugging it. This was determined by knowing the cap has an internal bleeder and using the RC time constant to allow the voltage to drop to a safe value to measure.
 
> Would this be indicative of a bad magnetron? Almost everything I read about magnetron troubleshooting leads me to believe there's nothing wrong with it, but then again the rest of the circuit also seems to be functioning correctly.
 
So.....magnetron seems to have failed again, not quite 1.5 years later. Microwave was running, then stopped heating. No bang, no smoke. I put my wattmeter on it, tried cooking again, saw around 1.2kW usage for a few seconds and thought it was ok, but then dropped to around 300W. I haven't taken it apart yet but my bet is a bad mag.
 
This was a genuine OEM replacement part from a reputable supplier. So either 1. the part was defective and prone to early failure from the start or 2. something is making it fail early. But what? As I think about the other parts, the transformer, diode and capacitor, I can't come up with a way for those parts to cause early mag failure. Transformers don't fail in a way that causes increased output voltage (not that I've seen), and a bad diode or cap doesn't seem to be capable of destroying the mag.
 
The original mag lasted 14 years and the usage has always been the same.
"Peter W." <peterwieck33@gmail.com>: Dec 26 03:50AM -0800

> On Saturday, July 17, 2021 at 3:57:08 PM UTC-5, hon...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > I have a microwave from the mid 2000s that failed on me. It uses basic circuitry: transformer, diode, cap, magnetron....not an inverter type or anything fancy like that. One morning it seemed to mostly work, but the output rapidly dropped over a few minutes. No bang, no smoke. Just stopped heating.
 
Or, another part has failed. Such as a relay, the contacts within the relay, something else....
 
Peter Wieck
Melrose Park, PA
Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com>: Dec 25 09:41AM -0700

On Sun, 25 Dec 2022 14:04:49 +0000, Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk>
wrote:
 
>> because of inexpert handling - don't blame yourself, it happens to all of us!
 
>When it happens, chop the lead in two with a vengeance and discard it, so you're
>not tempted to re-use it later "just temporarily" ...
 
 
Better than using a vengeance would be using wire cutter pliers.
micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>: Dec 25 01:13PM -0500

In alt.home.repair, on Sun, 25 Dec 2022 03:40:40 +0100, "Carlos E.R."
>secure the circuits when temps are out of range. Rather, nothing has
>been calculated beyond the design range, and anything could happen. It
>might even work perfectly outside of range. Or catch fire. Anything goes.
 
Okay, thanks. I won't assume those things. Now I have to think about
it all some more.
Char Jackson <none@none.invalid>: Dec 25 04:15PM -0600

On Sun, 25 Dec 2022 14:04:49 +0000, Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk>
wrote:
 
>> because of inexpert handling - don't blame yourself, it happens to all of us!
 
>When it happens, chop the lead in two with a vengeance and discard it, so you're
>not tempted to re-use it later "just temporarily" ...
 
That seems drastic. I've successfully used Ethernet cables where the
barb has fallen off, including one cable that has been barbless for a
number of years. I could lop off the connector and re-terminate it, and
I probably should, but it works fine as it is and I'm too lazy to fix
things that work, so here we are.
Paul <nospam@needed.invalid>: Dec 25 08:24PM -0500

On 12/25/2022 9:04 AM, Andy Burns wrote:
> Graham J wrote:
 
>> the barbs on RJ45 plugs do break off, rendering them useless.  They break because of inexpert handling - don't blame yourself, it happens to all of us!
 
> When it happens, chop the lead in two with a vengeance and discard it, so you're not tempted to re-use it later "just temporarily" ...
 
You can chop the head off with a vengeance, then put another head on.
Just like that Frankenstein movie.
 
https://www.amazon.ca/Shahe-Ethernet-Network-Tester-Crimping/dp/B08LQ8QF4Q
 
One of the images is a video (on the left), and shows "crimping on a new head".
 
It's just the first thing that showed up in a search, and has
no particular merits.
 
I've never done one of those, so can't say how easy it is to
get a good termination.
 
Paul
micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>: Dec 25 09:02PM -0500

In alt.home.repair, on Sun, 25 Dec 2022 20:24:06 -0500, Paul
 
>You can chop the head off with a vengeance, then put another head on.
>Just like that Frankenstein movie.
 
> https://www.amazon.ca/Shahe-Ethernet-Network-Tester-Crimping/dp/B08LQ8QF4Q
 
Char, Paul, I was going to ask about this. I have one of these tools
that I bought for phone cords, but the place that holds the plug is wide
enough ethernet. I just need some connectors.
 
Mine is just plastic but it worked well. I think I have a professional
model I got at a hamfest or yard sale.
 
The comments are mostly positive, but this is one star:
>this sucks, the blade doesn't trim wires properly and damages crystals, not worth the money. Wasted so much time on
installs just trying to trim a crystal properly
 
What is a crystal. The plastic end? Why is he trimming it?
---
Thhis is 4 stars but negative. It implies you should write down the
order of the wires before cutting off the original end.
 
Will probably work well…. but don't buy
Reviewed in the United States on September 13, 2021
Model: 4in1 Tool KitVerified Purchase
That is, if you've never done this before. Instead, get a pass-through
crimper and plug set and your life will be easier. See, the cable wires
 
[What's that?]

you want to splice must be unraveled into the 8 individual data wires
and put into a specific color order to be inserted into the modular plug
and then crimped. (By the way, the video on the page shows the order for
only the rare, 568A configuration. Most systems call for the 568B
configuration which orders the wires differently. Be sure you know what
configuration you are working with before you order the wire colors. A
568B wire-order diagram is on the product page.) It's not too difficult
to separate, smooth the wires, and get them into the right color order
when you're working with two inches of the cable wires. But holding that
order in your fingers right next to the plastic cable sheathing,
clipping the wires down to a half inch and then inserting all of them
all into the plug at the same time is very difficult for a first timer
and takes a lot of practice (I assume). The problem is that the wires
terminate at the end of the plug. You can't hold one wire in that
position while you mess with other wires that are misbehaving; and they
 
[I know. It was pretty easy for 4 wires, haven't tried more.]
 
will misbehave. The pass-through plugs help solve this by letting the
wires go in the back of the plug into their proper channel and then
extend out through the front end of the plug. This way you don't have to
clip the wires before inserting them. You can actually insert one wire
at a time and when it passes through the front bend it so that it stays
put while you insert the next wire in the order (a procedure that
probably infuriates the purists). Once all the wires are inserted
through in the right order the special pass-through crimper not only
locks down the wires and sheathing, but also clips the excess wires in
front of the plug. You just have to be careful when inserting the wires
that you don't skip a hole and end up one or two wires with no home.
You'll also want to twist the end of the loose wires together after
their all in to get them through the crimping hole cleanly. Finally,
remember to slip the plug cover on the cable before you start working
 
[shoudln't be "finally". Should be first.]
 
with the wire. You can find the pass-through crimpers here on Amazon by
searching for them specifically. It will still be a tedious process but
at least doable for a novice. Good luck.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
--
 
Here is one that is called pass-through. I don't know why it would be
easier.
https://www.amazon.com/CHZHLM-Through-Connector-Connectors-Stripper/dp/B0B73Y5RS4/ref=sr_1_1_sspa
 
>no particular merits.
 
>I've never done one of those, so can't say how easy it is to
>get a good termination.
 
Phone line was easy.
 
Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com>: Dec 25 08:13PM -0800

On 12/25/2022 6:02 PM, micky wrote:
> --
 
> Here is one that is called pass-through. I don't know why it would be
> easier.
 
I would imagine you can cut the wires much longer, push them through,
then pull them each tight to pull the wire casing tight into the
connector. then cut off the extra wire ends. That may be easier than
trying to cut them to the final length, get them ordered correctly in a
TIGHT flat pattern, then push them all the way into their appropriate holes.
 
 
Char Jackson <none@none.invalid>: Dec 25 11:30PM -0600

>no particular merits.
 
>I've never done one of those, so can't say how easy it is to
>get a good termination.
 
The crimper linked above is essentially what I use and it works well. It
probably helps that I've done a crap ton of them. If I was asked to make
a recommendation to someone who doesn't have much experience, I would
very definitely recommend the pass-thru type of connector. They're quite
a bit easier, especially for someone who's just getting started.
 
Someone else mentioned TIA 568B (vs 568A). If a diagram isn't handy, you
can use the other end of the cable that you're working on. Put the two
connectors side by side, not end to end, and just match the colors.
whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>: Dec 25 09:50PM -0800

On Monday, December 19, 2022 at 9:09:44 AM UTC-8, micky wrote:
> PC, or maybe something that connected straight to the PC.
 
> But all I see for sale are cameras meant to clip to the monitor, not be
> screwed to the wall.
 
Oh, they're available four outdoor install. This one, for instance <at temu.com search for LY02238>
The POE (power-over-ethernet) type don't require house current directly (you'll
need a switch or POE power injector in addition to ethernet interfaces).
Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk>: Dec 26 06:29AM

Char Jackson wrote:
 
 
> That seems drastic. I've successfully used Ethernet cables where the
> barb has fallen off, including one cable that has been barbless for a
> number of years.
 
And then one day, someone is doing the hoovering, or kicks a desk, or a pet gets
round the back, and something stops working ... if you can retuerminate it with
a new plug, sure but patch cables are cheap, stuff not working is frequently
expensive ...
Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk>: Dec 26 06:32AM

micky wrote:
 
> I have one of these tools
> that I bought for phone cords, but the place that holds the plug is wide
> enough ethernet. I just need some connectors.
 
Most plugs are for 'solid' cable, to repair patch cables you need to get the
type of plugs for 'stranded' cable, I think there is also a type of plug that
copes with both ...
Piet <www.godfatherof.nl/@opt-in.invalid>: Dec 26 10:40AM +0100

Ken Blake wrote:
 
>> A plastic lunch box, silicone sealant and a bit of home work would
>> do the job in a cheap way. I
 
> But if a hungry thief sees the lunch box...
 
Then (s)he would be disappointed by the not exactly nutritious content. ;-)
 
-p
Paul <nospam@needed.invalid>: Dec 26 05:05AM -0500

On 12/25/2022 9:02 PM, micky wrote:
 
>> I've never done one of those, so can't say how easy it is to
>> get a good termination.
 
> Phone line was easy.
 
It just means you can stuff the wires one at a time into
the connector and it won't pop out of place.
 
The T368A and T368B thing is for rolled or straight-thru cabling.
I can tell this, by noting the reversal of 1,2 3,6 on the two connectors
in the depiction.
 
1,2 to 1,2 Straight-thru (most all of my cables are like this)
3,6 to 3,6
 
1,2 to 3,6 Rolled cable (only one spare is like this, haven't used in some time)
3,6 to 1,2 (Could have blue boot on one end, red boot on other end of cable)
 
Any more info than that, you'll have to look up. A rolled cable
might be used between a broadband modem and a router. Straight cables
tend to be used from router to PC or switch to PC. Doing direct PC to PC,
uses a rolled cable (only if both ends are limited to 10/100BT NICs).
GbE equipment has MDI/MDIX which can deal with either straight or
rolled cabling.
 
Paul
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to sci.electronics.repair+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.