Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 6 updates in 2 topics

N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk>: Dec 01 02:00PM

Pure tin tinning on a component which should have had derogated Pb/Sn
tinning? The normal RoHS cheap component getting into the premium priced
aerospace/military/medical traditional-solder product stream?
 
"The problem was related to a cracked solder joint caused by exposure to
extreme temperatures."
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/dec/01/airasia-crew-actions-caused-jet-to-lose-control-say-crash-investigators
N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk>: Dec 01 02:23PM

On 01/12/2015 14:00, N_Cook wrote:
 
> "The problem was related to a cracked solder joint caused by exposure to
> extreme temperatures."
> http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/dec/01/airasia-crew-actions-caused-jet-to-lose-control-say-crash-investigators
 
technical report on
http://aviation-safety.net/
I've only keyword searched (solder,sn,pb) but amazingly I find no
reference to chemical testing of the solder or what type of solder in
the product manifests.
"pfjw@aol.com" <pfjw@aol.com>: Dec 01 07:22AM -0800

On Tuesday, December 1, 2015 at 9:23:11 AM UTC-5, N_Cook wrote:
> On 01/12/2015 14:00, N_Cook wrote:
> > Pure tin tinning on a component which should have had derogated Pb/Sn
 
If I were to render an opinion, pure tin as a mechanical joint is a very bad idea, nor would I think that a sophisticated manufacturer would do that as a matter of intent. Pure tin is extremely brittle, and should NEVER be depended upon in any sort of situation where mechanical stresses (expansion/contraction/flexing) will take place. Add to this the whole issue of tin whiskers (which NASA, at least now understands all too painfully). If what you suggest is accurate, this is a design flaw of significant magnitude. If it is present fleet-wide, it is time to ground these beasts until the problem is addressed specifically.
 
I would hope that aircraft manufacturers by now would have learned that some admixture to their solders is a necessary step to reliability. And would have learned by now from the Nuclear industry if not NASA that relying on pure tin is a dangerous practice.
 
All-and-at-the-same-time, counterfeit parts are getting into the OEM repair stream at every level. It would not be difficult to believe where such parts may get into the OEM first-install stream as well.
 
Peter Wieck
Melrose Park, PA
N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk>: Dec 01 03:28PM


> All-and-at-the-same-time, counterfeit parts are getting into the OEM repair stream at every level. It would not be difficult to believe where such parts may get into the OEM first-install stream as well.
 
> Peter Wieck
> Melrose Park, PA
 
I know from someone in the medical electronics field, that is extremely
difficult , if not impossible, to guarantee that PbF components do not
get into the derogated product stream, without sample chemical testing
of each batch of componnts, done themselves. The supposed accredited
documentation is easily compromised and cannot be relied on. With all
the extra markup on derogated components, plenty of motive.
"pfjw@aol.com" <pfjw@aol.com>: Dec 01 08:27AM -0800

On Tuesday, December 1, 2015 at 10:28:49 AM UTC-5, N_Cook wrote:
 
> of each batch of componnts, done themselves. The supposed accredited
> documentation is easily compromised and cannot be relied on. With all
> the extra markup on derogated components, plenty of motive.
 
There are multiple exemptions for medical and certain industrial devices through 2019.
 
Peter Wieck
Melrose Park, PA
N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk>: Dec 01 09:44AM

Cut the cable ties to get the pcbs out. Then noticed one of the ac HT
wires loose. It looks as though the blade may have been between
shoe of crimp and the plastic cover, needed much more than finger
pressure to slide the crimp over the terminal.
Power fading up and down i could see that causing, will try simulating
to see if a possible source of crackle when I power up with boards out
of chassis.
The pots are "digital" fashion. I was hoping the amp could be used
without the DSP board connected as owner only ever uses clean, will
check for that as well. Then try hot air and attack boards with nylon
tipped engraver tool (headphone monitoring), to see if that divines any
failed pbf joints, nothing suspect seen visually, plus ca change.
Then a matter of resoldering the usual suspects and keep fingers crossed.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to sci.electronics.repair+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

No Response to "Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 6 updates in 2 topics"

Post a Comment