- Identifying the Opera browser unique identification strng - 1 Update
- What is the realistic accuracy & precision of typical consumer MPG calculations (tripmeter miles/pump gallons) - 8 Updates
- 2004 CD player - 1 Update
- RCA P60928 convergence - 2 Updates
- cleaing cassette heads and roller. - 2 Updates
- need chicago electric battery charger wireing diagram or manual sku#30190 #hf63043 - 3 Updates
Mad Roger <rogermadd@yahoo.com>: Jul 25 03:01PM Just starting Opera to a blank page makes connections, depending on the setup, where the current set of connections includes a few things that we can discount, such as an autoupdate of some sort, and speedials and some search engine updates. Slowly I'm turning off each of these below, using the Opera settings, and/or the /etc/hosts file so that I can narrow down what it connects to for sending the Subscriber-ID (from Opera Inc) and Device-ID (from SurfEasy). # Result Protocol Host URL Body Caching Content-Type Process Comments Custom 37 200 HTTP Tunnel to autoupdate.geo.opera.com:443 0 opera_autoupdate:10512 # Result Protocol Host URL Body Caching Content-Type Process Comments Custom 38 200 HTTP www.ecb.europa.eu /stats/eurofxref/eurofxref-daily.xml 1,624 text/xml opera:7576 # Result Protocol Host URL Body Caching Content-Type Process Comments Custom 24 200 HTTPS speeddials.opera.com /api/v1/suggestions?country=US&language=en-US&uuid=ae57db72-45af-4547-8714-4d0686940320&type=desktop-suggestions 1,496 max-age=3600 application/json opera:9080 # Result Protocol Host URL Body Caching Content-Type Process Comments Custom 5 304 HTTP crl.globalsign.net /root-r2.crl 0 Expires: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 13:23:06 GMT svchost:1668 # Result Protocol Host URL Body Caching Content-Type Process Comments Custom 6 304 HTTP pki.google.com /GIAG2.crl 0 Expires: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:45:30 GMT svchost:1668 Still working on it though so take this with a huge grain of salt because I'm only looking at the http protocol right now (so that I can narrow down the data to search through). |
root <NoEMail@home.org>: Jul 24 05:00PM > to overcome air resistance. I don't know how tires impact the equation and > of course since all these speeds are in top gear the entire drive train is > turning 33% faster as well. It is true that air resistance goes up a square of the speed, but the power requirement, and the corresponding rate of fuel consumption, goes up as the cube. Work=force*distance, Power=force*speed. |
Tekkie® <Tekkie@comcast.net>: Jul 24 03:17PM -0400 Vic Smith posted for all of us... > His response to me totally ignored those responses, and he posed the same questions again! > Then, for some reason, he stated talking about speedometers. > He's a troll. Exactly what I have been posting. This guy is the valve stem thread, bead breaker, etc troll. -- Tekkie |
"pfjw@aol.com" <pfjw@aol.com>: Jul 24 01:00PM -0700 Y'all are feeding the troll by responding at any level pasts 2nd grade arithmetic. Full Stop. Peter Wieck Melrose Park, PA |
rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com>: Jul 24 07:23PM -0400 root wrote on 7/24/2017 1:00 PM: > It is true that air resistance goes up a square of the speed, but > the power requirement, and the corresponding rate of fuel consumption, > goes up as the cube. Work=force*distance, Power=force*speed. You are right that the horsepower requirement goes with the cube. But, that doesn't impact the gas mileage. Since you are traveling faster you drive for a shorter time, so that extra factor in power cancels out. No? -- Rick C |
clare@snyder.on.ca: Jul 24 09:46PM -0400 >You are right that the horsepower requirement goes with the cube. But, that >doesn't impact the gas mileage. Since you are traveling faster you drive >for a shorter time, so that extra factor in power cancels out. No? No, because the speed doubling takes only half the time, but 4 time the power. Not necessarilly 4 times the fuel, because the engine may be "on the cam" at the higher speed, running more efficiently. An example of this was the 1975 Toyota Celica GT. With the 1975 gearing, it was actually most efficient at 80MPH in 5th, as long as you didn't have to change speed or pass anyone. (I got 52MPG at just over 80mph from Waterloo to Kingston Ontario at 2am on a Sunday morning back in 1979-ish. Didn't work on the 1976 model - same body (and engine) but different gearing |
rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com>: Jul 24 10:32PM -0400 > morning back in 1979-ish. > Didn't work on the 1976 model - same body (and engine) but different > gearing What was the lowest speed you could use 5th gear in the 75 car? -- Rick C |
clare@snyder.on.ca: Jul 24 10:48PM -0400 >> Didn't work on the 1976 model - same body (and engine) but different >> gearing >What was the lowest speed you could use 5th gear in the 75 car? Can't remember for sure, but it was a DOG at 60mph - requiresd a downshift to get anywhere. I think hey geared the 75 GT the same as the 4 speed. I know I was shocked by the mileage on that trip - going out to Kingston to pit crew for Taisto Heinonnen, "The Flying Fynn" and Tom Burgess on the Twin Lakes Rally. Crewsd for him on the Tall Pines and the Blossom too. I was offered his backup Celica Team car in 1980 when we finished rallying in the navigational rallye series (After finishing 1st, second and third in 3 years we were no longer elligible) and our R12 was not adequate to run competetively in the performance series but I decided to quit while I was ahead, since I was getting married. |
rbowman <bowman@montana.com>: Jul 24 09:20PM -0600 > you didn't have to change speed or pass anyone. (I got 52MPG at just > over 80mph from Waterloo to Kingston Ontario at 2am on a Sunday > morning back in 1979-ish. I had the misfortune to own a '71 Audi when the 55 mph national speed limit went into effect. The German engineers thought 55 was a very brief period on your way to cruising speed not a speed you'd try to drive. |
Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com>: Jul 24 06:54PM -0700 ~misfit~ wrote: -------------------- > >> areas. > > ** Shame how that admission completely removes your original claim. > I didn't think that you were going to split hairs. ** And I'm not. > > The whole game is wavelength dependant. > Perhaps with blu-ray it is but not so much with CDs as the dark and light > areas are large enough for any wavelength to read you moron. ** Pressed CDs do not have dark and light areas. The pits are exactly 1/4 wave deep the 780nm IR wavelength used - the IR laser light travels and extra half wavelength causing self cancellation. Go look it up. > > ** The dye simply becomes opaque. > Which is a fuckwit way of saying it's reflectivity index or ability to > transmit light has changed. ** Remember posting this? " Actually CDRs are much less reflective than 'pressed' CDs and as such some older CD players don't have the laser power needed to get a good (reflected) signal. " > > A euphemism for bullshitting. > I see you're back to your MO of trying to be so obnoxious as to scare others > off so you can have the last say. Funny how it always happens in the evening ** The one being obnoxious here is you - pal. .... Phil |
jurb6006@gmail.com: Jul 24 05:25PM -0700 >"Never seen an RCA TV in the UK, and I think the GE ones were co produced with Hitachi. " Here, Hitachi and RCA had quite the relationship. They built bigscreens for each other. You could open up an RCA and find a Hitachi or open up a Hitachi and find an RCA. The last two it seems were Mitsubishi and Sony if you actually wanted their product, everyone else eventually would just buy whatever and have it rebadged. >"One of the setups with RCA tubes used a low voltage flyback system - it was hard to get transistors that could handle the current. " Did not run into that problem. I did have some small Emersons that were hard to get a damper diode for because it was such high current. But not an RCA. But you said RCA tubes, that is not the fault of the tubes. It is the fault of the engineers. |
tabbypurr@gmail.com: Jul 24 06:09PM -0700 On Tuesday, 18 July 2017 21:42:52 UTC+1, John-Del wrote: > I remember when NYC was reducing power during the 70s in an "energy saving" attempt. Well Sony power supplies committed harakiri at not much less than 100VAC, and lots of Trinitrons were blowing up during the brown-outs. > The Trinitron when it worked right produced some fabulous images, but I think the tube was very finicky and required far more stringent manufacturing tolerances than the typical tube, hence the cost. Give it a small nudge and the shadow mask would shift or one of the wires would snap. Early tubes had the coaxial second anode connector and those tubes would short internally. > Don't miss those days. (much) I remember the PSU boards in 70s trinitron sets. Talk about unnecessarily complex. As an experiment I once replaced the PSU board with a lightbulb as a dropper. (I forget how I provided filament power.) It worked, though voltage instability caused picture height instability. I liked those sets as they were well valued but CRT emission tended to go. No-one else had worked out how to get the emission back, I did. NT |
jurb6006@gmail.com: Jul 24 05:07PM -0700 >"** Got the tiniest idea what happens if you never clean the pinch roller?? Obviously not. " The worst part is that the pinch roller is on the oxide side of the tape. Older VCRs were like that but they fixed it by using an elevator gear and dropping the pinch roller to the inside. There is no practical way to do this with an audio cassette. Actually eight tracks were better in that respect, though the pinch roller was included in the cassette. Actually, some of them did not use rubber ones, they just made them out of plastic and they played fine. Actually they could outperform cassettes as they had double the tape speed. But there were other limitations, like no rewind. To clean a pinch roller I usually used something abrasive, like a paint scuffing pad. Like the idler wheel in a turntable, if you make it a bit smaller it does not change the speed. In the case of a turntable it is the diameter of the motor shaft, in a tape deck it is a matter of the capstan diameter. Just don't make it small enough that it does not engage. Oe main thing to keep the wow and flutter down is to make it even. If it is uneven you got problems. I almost always had the deck running when I cleaned the pinch roller, let it turn. I did the same with VCRs by using a dummy tape. Anyway, older car cassette decks can be a real PITA. You might just want to get one of those fake cassettes that you plug something in to, like an MP3 player or something. Very few car cassette players were better than a 160 K MP3, if any. Or there are those FM modulators that just transmit to the FM, nut those are limited to 15 KHz. But do you really care when you are driving across Texas ? I doubt it. |
tabbypurr@gmail.com: Jul 24 05:58PM -0700 > To clean a pinch roller I usually used something abrasive, like a paint scuffing pad. Like the idler wheel in a turntable, if you make it a bit smaller it does not change the speed. In the case of a turntable it is the diameter of the motor shaft, in a tape deck it is a matter of the capstan diameter. Just don't make it small enough that it does not engage. > Oe main thing to keep the wow and flutter down is to make it even. If it is uneven you got problems. I almost always had the deck running when I cleaned the pinch roller, let it turn. I did the same with VCRs by using a dummy tape. > Anyway, older car cassette decks can be a real PITA. You might just want to get one of those fake cassettes that you plug something in to, like an MP3 player or something. Very few car cassette players were better than a 160 K MP3, if any. Or there are those FM modulators that just transmit to the FM, nut those are limited to 15 KHz. But do you really care when you are driving across Texas ? I doubt it. 8 tracks were overtaken by cassettes, but continued in use. What finished them off was how badly they ended up slipping. The system they used to ensure even tape transport was really not ok. NT |
"vgehlhauen@netzero.com" <vrgehlhausen@gmail.com>: Jul 24 11:51AM -0700 need wireing diagram |
"vgehlhausen@netzero.com" <vrgehlhausen@gmail.com>: Jul 24 11:53AM -0700 |
"Percival P. Cassidy" <Nobody@NotMyISP.net>: Jul 24 03:01PM -0400 > need wireing diagram > https://manuals.harborfreight.com/manuals/63000-63999/63043.pdf Perce |
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to sci.electronics.repair+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No Response to "Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 17 updates in 6 topics"
Post a Comment