| henryjohnson1326@gmail.com: Mar 07 07:42PM -0800 I have one for$75 |
| Fox's Mercantile <jdangus@att.net>: Mar 07 09:54PM -0600 > I have one for $75 Good for you. Shove it up your ass. -- "I am a river to my people." Jeff-1.0 WA6FWi http:foxsmercantile.com |
| "pfjw@aol.com" <peterwieck33@gmail.com>: Mar 08 07:39AM -0800 On Thursday, March 7, 2019 at 10:54:47 PM UTC-5, Fox's Mercantile wrote: > Good for you. Shove it up your ass. Jeff: These are cheap Chinese knock-offs, available at any time for less than $5 from street-vendors in any Chinese city or airport. Extending one of them into any sort of fundamental orifice would probably be fatal. ----- |
| Tom Biasi <tombiasi@optonline.net>: Mar 08 10:42AM -0500 > On Thursday, March 7, 2019 at 10:54:47 PM UTC-5, Fox's Mercantile wrote: >> Good for you. Shove it up your ass. > Jeff: Extending one of them into any sort of fundamental orifice would probably be fatal. > ----- For the person or the watch? |
| "pfjw@aol.com" <peterwieck33@gmail.com>: Mar 08 08:29AM -0800 On Friday, March 8, 2019 at 10:42:22 AM UTC-5, Tom Biasi wrote: > For the person or the watch? Does it matter? |
| etpm@whidbey.com: Mar 07 09:24AM -0800 On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 06:26:35 -0800 (PST), "pfjw@aol.com" >Whatever the intent - this is a perfect example of running down the proverbial rabbit-hole. Even if entirely possible, the results are dubious and the utility of the equipment destroyed except as a curiosity. >Peter Wieck >Melrose Park, PA We don't know yet if the laser measure will work. Whether its utility is destroyed or not. In fact, it seems to be working so far. I'm glad he is posting his experiments. Eric |
| N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk>: Mar 07 06:30PM On 06/03/2019 21:22, whit3rd wrote: >> (twice the square law), so I think you are out of luck. > You might consider using a retroreflective surface as your target (there's > corner-cubes, bike reflectors, or Scotchlite products available). That reminded me one of these was laying neglected in the store, broken power supply ISTR. http://www.aga-museum.nl/page/geodimeter-model-12- the 14 version. I dug it out and opened it up before trying to power up. 1978/79 CMOS and TTL and a rat's nest of after-thought/fudge flying components, despite OEM. Mini Nixi tubes I think rather than the pre-7 segment LED, electroluminescent displays , or perhaps mini CC display, difficult to view. Looking at the manual the original spec was up to 60km range with exceptionaly clear visibility it says ,and requiring one of those multi-prism reflectors , they left on the moon. I'd still rather mod a new replaceable DIY unit than this EDM that should be in a museum. |
| "pfjw@aol.com" <peterwieck33@gmail.com>: Mar 07 10:38AM -0800 > We don't know yet if the laser measure will work. Whether its utility > is destroyed or not. In fact, it seems to be working so far. I'm glad > he is posting his experiments. Eric: I am writing from the perspective of one who must rely on accurate measurements for revenue, and whose instruments are calibrated to this end. For the purposes of a hobby - that is an entirely different matter. Peter Wieck Melrose Park, PA |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to sci.electronics.repair+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No Response to "Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 8 updates in 2 topics"
Post a Comment