| Arlen Holder <arlen.george.holder@is.invalid>: Mar 03 08:09PM Has Peter Wieck ever added any technical value to any thread on this newsgroup in his entire life? o "pfjw@aol.com" <peterwieck33@gmail.com> If so, please post a link to a thread he opened of on-topic added value: o ? o ? o ? All Peter Wieck can do, is post worthless meaningless child-like posts. o Just watch. -- Only 2 types of people are on Usenet: those who add value & those who can't. |
| Fox's Mercantile <jdangus@att.net>: Mar 03 03:19PM -0600 On 3/3/20 2:09 PM, Arlen Holder wrote: [ More whining ] Go fuck yourself. -- "I am a river to my people." Jeff-1.0 WA6FWi http:foxsmercantile.com |
| "pfjw@aol.com" <peterwieck33@gmail.com>: Mar 03 01:27PM -0800 Clearly, as Arlen Holder is entirely unencumbered by the Thought Process - I must translate for him. "You can't fix stupid". That would be you, Arlen. Thank you for showing the rest of us exactly what "those who can't" look like. Peter Wieck Melrose Park, PA |
| Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com>: Mar 03 02:37PM -0800 Arlen Holder wrote: ------------------------- > Has Peter Wieck ever added any technical value to any thread on this > newsgroup in his entire life? ** Not sure about "in his entire life" but certainly in the last 15 years or so he only adds negative information and spreads chaos. I have wasted many hours trying to get the retarded old fool to bugger off - but like a bad smell he keeps hanging around. > All Peter Wieck can do, is post worthless meaningless child-like posts. > o Just watch. ** "Weaky" is a massive narcissist, so you child-like comment is spot on. AKAIK you are the only person besides me to ever notice how bad he is and expose him for being a mental defective. Good luck.... ... Phil |
| Bob Engelhardt <BobEngelhardt@comcast.net>: Mar 03 06:19PM -0500 On 3/3/2020 3:09 PM, Arlen Holder wrote: > Has Peter Wieck ever added any technical value to any thread on this > newsgroup in his entire life? ... Like this thread? Lots of technical value here. Most readers allow blocking posters - why don't you just do that? |
| Arlen Holder <arlen.george.holder@is.invalid>: Mar 04 04:44AM On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 18:19:45 -0500, Bob Engelhardt wrote: > Like this thread? Lots of technical value here. Most readers allow > blocking posters - why don't you just do that? Hi Bob Engelhardt, FACT: *Peter Wieck has never added any thread of any adult value on this ng* *in the entire history of Usenet!* To your point, Bob Engelhardt, and since I'm an adult, I will answer the same _adult_ challenge that I asked about this worthless Peter Wieck. To that end, I'll point to a thread I opened, in the past, on this ng, that contains items of on-topic technical value, where you'll note that there are cites, links, references, details, model number, photos, diagrams, etc. o Where do you source 35 Amp 220VAC circuit breakers that are NOT in typical box stores? <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.electronics.repair/JGsdtAyaPp8/BvkSxaGpBAAJ> While that's more on-topic value than Peter Wieck has ever posted to this ng in the entire history of Usenet, here's another thread of adult value (where you'll note that there are cites, links, references, details, model number, photos, diagrams, etc.): o How the heck does a typical home transfer switch work? <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.electronics.repair/QhSY4KWN-Kw/wq7gyUk9BAAJ> And while we're at it, here's another, all of which Peter Wiech shit upon, where you'll note that there are cites, links, references, details, model number, photos, diagrams, etc. o Which glue, available at any hardware store, for the screen of a mobile phone? <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.electronics.repair/CDuAlRslinU/crxjBLUoHgAJ> *And yet, Peter Wieck shits his big steaming pile of poop on every thread!* Bearing in mind it's well known that Peter Wieck has _never_ even once in his life opened a thread on this newsgroup of on-topic technical value in the entire history of Usenet, let's ask Peter Wieck to simply answer the simple adult question I just answered for you: Name a _single_ thread of on-topic technical value that Peter Wieck opened on this newsgroup in the entire history of Usenet. Name just one. You can rest assured there's an adult reason I ask this question now, on the sci.electronics.repair newsgroup - which is to prove the point. *Peter Wieck has never added any thread of any adult value on this ng* *in the entire history of Usenet!* All I ask is for anyone to name _any_ value ever added by Peter Wieck. o Just one thread he's created that contains _adult_ on topic value. Just one thread, by Peter Wieck, of _adult_ on-topic technical value. o In the entire history of Usenet. All I ask if for _one_ thread, in Peter Wieck's _entire_ life, that he opened, on this newsgroup, that added on-topic _adult_ technical value. Can _anyone_ on this planet find even a _single_ thread opened by Peter Wieck on this newsgroup in the entire history of Usenet, that added even a single iota of adult technical value? Nobody? o Not even a _single_ thread by Peter Wieck has any _adult_ value? Not even one? FACT: *Peter Wieck has never added any thread of any adult value on this ng* *in the entire history of Usenet!* |
| Fox's Mercantile <jdangus@att.net>: Mar 04 04:53AM -0600 On 3/3/20 10:44 PM, Arlen Holder wrote: [ Nothing of value as usual ] Go fuck yourself, you useless pile of shit. -- "I am a river to my people." Jeff-1.0 WA6FWi http:foxsmercantile.com |
| "pfjw@aol.com" <peterwieck33@gmail.com>: Mar 04 07:12AM -0800 I dunno - Phil gives me the impression that he is one to cheat at solitaire, and Arlen cannot cheat as he cannot count that high. Peter Wieck Melrose Park, PA |
| b23sunwoodllc@gmail.com: Mar 04 07:23AM -0800 On Tuesday, March 3, 2020 at 8:44:14 PM UTC-8, Arlen Holder wrote: > > Like this thread? Lots of technical value here. Most readers allow > > blocking posters - why don't you just do that? > Hi Bob Engelhardt, You are a worthless pest who is not adding any value to this newsgroup with this diatribe. Bob simply asked you why you don't simply block or ignore posters who you choose to allow to annoy you. Why don't you simply do that? |
| Arlen Holder <arlen.george.holder@is.invalid>: Mar 04 04:05PM > why you don't simply block or ignore posters who you > choose to allow to annoy you. Why don't you simply do that? Hi b23 sun wood llc, Why don't you ask Peter Wieck to stop his incessantly cowardly bullying of others? o Why do I, as the recipient of his cowardly bullying, have to endure him? I teach at local schools, where there are plenty of cowardly bullies. o If we ignore the cowardly bullies, what message does that tell them? We are _taught_ to explain to the cowardly bullies that their unilateral actions are not conducive to a purposefully helpful experience on Usenet, where you can rest assured, this post was as a _response_ to Peter Wieck's incessant cowardly bullying. The _adult_ message of this thread is simple, direct, and factual: *Peter Wieck has never added any thread of any adult value on this ng* *in the entire history of Usenet!* Peter Wieck is welcome to use his "adult" skills to belie that fact simply by pointing to a _single_ thread he authored on this ng in the entire history of Usenet that he can maintain contains actual adult on-topic technical value: o ? (where is that thread containing actual adult value) ? FACT: *The fact that _nobody_ can find _any_ thread of value from Peter Wieck...* o *in the entire _history_ of Usenet ... is a sobering fact indeed ...* -- There are only 2 types of people on Usenet; those who add value & those who can't. |
| RosemontCrest <b23sunwoodllc@gmail.com>: Mar 04 08:33AM -0800 On Wednesday, March 4, 2020 at 8:05:23 AM UTC-8, Arlen Holder wrote: > > choose to allow to annoy you. Why don't you simply do that? > Why don't you ask Peter Wieck to stop his incessantly cowardly bullying of others? > o Why do I, as the recipient of his cowardly bullying, have to endure him? I do not care. > There are only 2 types of people on Usenet; those who add value & those who can't. You are among the latter who is not adding value. |
| Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com>: Mar 03 06:04PM On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 08:36:34 -0800, John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> wrote: >CRT tube cathode is typically under 200VDC, not exactly EHV, and the >screen may run in at 400V. Focus is likely 2K or so, but that is why one >stocks a HV meter. The 'scope is for monitoring the cathode, not the EHT. I think you need to be more careful with the advice you're dishing out here. The cathode on this tube runs at -2850VDC with the anode at only +84VDC. Please don't generalise about the tube potentials on these pieces of test equipment. Someone else may read your remarks on Google a year or more in the future and end up killing themselves. |
| John Robertson <spam@flippers.com>: Mar 03 11:16AM -0800 On 2020/03/03 10:04 a.m., Cursitor Doom wrote: > +84VDC. Please don't generalise about the tube potentials on these > pieces of test equipment. Someone else may read your remarks on Google > a year or more in the future and end up killing themselves. I was not aware that those tubes used such a high negative voltage. Thank you for pointing it out. I am certainly not afraid to admit when I make mistakes! John :-#)# |
| Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com>: Mar 03 07:33PM On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 11:16:13 -0800, John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> wrote: >I was not aware that those tubes used such a high negative voltage. >Thank you for pointing it out. I am certainly not afraid to admit when I >make mistakes! That marks you out as totally unique in the Usenet community; well done! :-D |
| All Bumbed Up <allbummedup@cao.net>: Mar 03 01:48PM -0500 Since I last posted, I was able to finish circuit board layout in Target 3001 and now have a schematic, but it's all a "ratsnest" of criss crossing wires. I can pull components to other places, but what's the best way to do it? Not nearly as simple as I thought it would be. Is there any sort of guide I could use? Thanks in advance. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to sci.electronics.repair+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No Response to "Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 15 updates in 3 topics"
Post a Comment