Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 12 updates in 3 topics

Mike S <mscir@yahoo.com>: May 21 08:14PM -0700

On 5/20/2020 11:00 PM, Charlie+ wrote:
>> Mike
 
> Poundland cheap £1 Battery bank - they use USB small board to charge and
> have BM you can use with 18650 or smaller Li cel - it doesnt matter. C+
 
Thanks!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnG86QMxGqw
eclectiktronikmail@gmail.com: May 21 02:50PM -0700

On Monday, 20 April 2020 17:39:10 UTC+2, John Robertson wrote:
> > Wow! I just got back on Usenet after literally 18+ years and it's great
> > to see this is one of the last text groups still active with real people
> > talking! Good to see Sam Goldwasser and others still on here.
 
Likewise. This is the first time I've been on here for at least a decade!
regards, b.
John Larkin <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com>: May 21 10:33AM -0700

On Sun, 17 May 2020 14:15:31 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
>Is it feasible to remove the whiskers by this sort of method or any other?
 
>Thanks,
 
>CD
 
Does anyone still make ge transistors? I can't think of any use for
them.
 
The only production ge devices I know of (excepting SiGe) are back
diodes, which I think are the only germanium parts fabricated using
lithography.
 
--
 
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement
 
jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org: May 21 06:09PM

John Larkin <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in
 
>>CD
 
> Does anyone still make ge transistors? I can't think of any use
> for them.
 
General Electric? Hehehe.. You mean Ge as in Germanium.
 
https://spectrum.ieee.org/semiconductors/materials/germanium-can-take-
transistors-where-silicon-cant
 
 
> The only production ge devices I know of (excepting SiGe) are back
> diodes, which I think are the only germanium parts fabricated
> using lithography.
 
https://www.americanradiohistory.com/Archive-Catalogs/GE/GE-Transistor-
Manual-No.-5---1960.CV01.pdf
Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net>: May 21 02:12PM -0400

On 2020-05-21 13:33, John Larkin wrote:
 
> The only production ge devices I know of (excepting SiGe) are back
> diodes, which I think are the only germanium parts fabricated using
> lithography.
 
Ge makes good photodiodes for some uses. They're very leaky, but if you
make the epi thin enough, they can cover 350-1800 nm, which otherwise
requires expensive stacked-die devices. Garden-variety ones are more
like ordinary InGaAs, i.e. 800-1800 nm, which is much less interesting.
 
Cheers
 
Phil Hobbs
 
--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
 
http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org: May 21 06:13PM

John Larkin <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in
 
> The only production ge devices I know of (excepting SiGe) are back
> diodes, which I think are the only germanium parts fabricated
> using lithography.
 
Also as a side note to the title of this entire thread...
 
'Vintage transistors' were NOT 'tin plated' like todays parts are.
They were Nickel Cadmium plated. A far superior plating but with
carcinogenic dangers that caused Cadmium and Cadmium alloys to be
banned. But you can still buy, eat and die from Beryllium parts.
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org: May 21 06:16PM

Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote in
> much less interesting.
 
> Cheers
 
> Phil Hobbs
 
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.7567/JJAPS.14S1.57
John Larkin <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com>: May 21 01:39PM -0700

On Thu, 21 May 2020 14:12:43 -0400, Phil Hobbs
>like ordinary InGaAs, i.e. 800-1800 nm, which is much less interesting.
 
>Cheers
 
>Phil Hobbs
 
Our FLIR has a germanium lens.
 
https://www.dropbox.com/s/uda77g9w66x3u9f/Flir_E45_WA_Lens.JPG?raw=1
 
 
 
--
 
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement
 
jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net>: May 21 05:20PM -0400


>> Cheers
 
>> Phil Hobbs
 
> https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.7567/JJAPS.14S1.57
 
That's a thin-film bolometer, similar in general character to the ones
used in modern uncooled microbolometer cameras. Compared with
visible/NIR photodiodes, they're slow and very insensitive, but they
sure do have a wide wavelength range.
 
20 years ago I built an interesting system called "Footprints" that I've
discussed here a few times over the years. It used an array of 96
carbon-ink pixels screen-printed on a 9-um thick free-standing film of
PVDF (which is basically fluorinated Saran Wrap). The pixels were 3 x 5
mm on a 6-mm pitch, to leave room for the wiring. The readout
multiplexer was a single red display LED per pixel.
 
Diodes ideally conduct in only one direction. The particular LEDs I
used leaked less than 50 fA between -5V and +0.5V bias. Interfacing
them to an AC-only sensor such as a pyoelectric requires a bit of bias
current, which in my gizmo was supplied by four green display LEDs,
which allowed the processor to adjust the average bias current between 0
and about 5 pA per LED.
 
The optical system was a moulded Fresnel lens made out of HDPE
(bleach-bottle plastic).
 
When it was done, it had very competitive sensitivity: noise equivalent
delta-T of just over 0.1 K, not bad for something so minimalistic.
 
We tried licensing it, but couldn't because the parts cost was too low.
 
Cheers
 
Phil Hobbs
 
--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
 
http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com
Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net>: May 21 05:26PM -0400

On 2020-05-21 16:39, John Larkin wrote:
 
>> Phil Hobbs
 
> Our FLIR has a germanium lens.
 
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/uda77g9w66x3u9f/Flir_E45_WA_Lens.JPG?raw=1
 
Germanium makes really good IR lenses. Besides the built-in filtering
action, it has a refractive index of 4. The optical power of a given
surface is (n-1)/r, where n is the index and r is the radius.
 
Glass is generally around n = 1.5-1.8, so a Ge lens of a given power has
4-6 times the radius of curvature. Aberrations are much reduced due to
the weaker curvature, so a simpler lens can have better performance.
Also of course the diffraction spot size goes like lambda, so in terms
of the diffraction limit a Ge lens at 10 um is like 100 times easier to
design than a glass lens at 500 nm.
 
Cheers
 
Phil Hobbs
 
--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
 
http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com
Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net>: May 21 05:29PM -0400

On 2020-05-21 17:26, Phil Hobbs wrote:
> Also of course the diffraction spot size goes like lambda, so in terms
> of the diffraction limit a Ge lens at 10 um is like 100 times easier to
> design than a glass lens at 500 nm.
 
Oh, and the dispersion of Ge out in the thermal IR is much less than
glass in the visible, so you don't even need to achromatize it. The
tempcos of index and of optical path length are quite large, so you do
need to athermalize in general, something that's rarely required in the
visible.
 
Cheers
 
Phil Hobbs
 
 
--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
 
http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com
John Larkin <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com>: May 21 02:49PM -0700

On Thu, 21 May 2020 17:26:09 -0400, Phil Hobbs
>design than a glass lens at 500 nm.
 
>Cheers
 
>Phil Hobbs
 
That lens stays in focus up to the point it touches a part. It will
clearly show the hot spot on an 0603 resistor.
 
Here's a tiny dual transistor,
 
https://www.dropbox.com/s/dd072w1z2gmfpbt/Dual_NPN.jpg?raw=1
 
obviously two separate chips inside.
 
--
 
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement
 
jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to sci.electronics.repair+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

No Response to "Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 12 updates in 3 topics"

Post a Comment