Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 5 updates in 1 topic

etpm@whidbey.com: Jul 19 12:39PM -0700

One of the EL34 tubes in my amp was making intermittent noise so I
bought a couple new matched EL 34 tubes and put them in the amp. They
sounded OK but not great. At first I thought it was the particular
recording that was sounding so bad because the recording was bad. It
was the Happy Trails album by Quicksilver Messaging Service. The
original recording just wasn't the best quality.
Then about a week later I was listening to some Herbie Hancock and
the sound was kinda muddy or muffled sounding. It did not have the
same clarity as it did with the first set of tubes. So I swapped in
the old pair and and there was a marked difference in the quality of
the sound. I was really surprised at the difference.
Now I gotta shop for some better tubes. What is done in the
manufacturing of tubes that can have such a big difference?
Eric
John-Del <ohger1s@gmail.com>: Jul 19 04:04PM -0700

> Now I gotta shop for some better tubes. What is done in the
> manufacturing of tubes that can have such a big difference?
> Eric
 
I can't answer your question, but would it have killed you to put the brand names of the original set of outputs and the replacement set you installed, or the amp you're using?
 
Also, did you bias the new tubes properly? If they're running too cold they'll sound like crap.
 
I never heard much difference between brands of EL34s, 6CA7s, and even 8417s I've used in my vintage Fisher integrated amp. They all sounded fine until they became flabby with age.
Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com>: Jul 20 02:23AM -0700

John-Del = Dope wrote:
 
===========================
 
> I can't answer your question,
 
 
* It ain't a Q - it's a troll.
 
 
but would it have killed you to put the brand names of the original set of outputs and the replacement set you installed, or the amp you're using?
 
** Nowadays, there are only two kinds of *new* EL34s, Chinese and Russian.
 
The former suck while the latter are mostly OK.

 
> I never heard much difference between brands of EL34s, 6CA7s,
> and even 8417s I've used in my vintage Fisher integrated amp.
> They all sounded fine until they became flabby with age.
 
** Happens to people too....
 
 
 
 
... Phil
etpm@whidbey.com: Jul 20 08:57AM -0700

On Sun, 19 Jul 2020 16:04:12 -0700 (PDT), John-Del <ohger1s@gmail.com>
wrote:
 
 
>I can't answer your question, but would it have killed you to put the brand names of the original set of outputs and the replacement set you installed, or the amp you're using?
 
>Also, did you bias the new tubes properly? If they're running too cold they'll sound like crap.
 
>I never heard much difference between brands of EL34s, 6CA7s, and even 8417s I've used in my vintage Fisher integrated amp. They all sounded fine until they became flabby with age.
Yeah, I almost had a heart attack when I tried posting the name
brands. But I'm not the type who gives up easily. The better sounding
tubes are Psvane brand tubes. The worse sounding tubes are
Electro-Harmonics. Oh crap! My heart! Call 911!
This is the amp: https://www.aliexpress.com/i/1988522234.html
The amp has no bias adjustment. I know that different circuits are
used for adjustable bias and auto bias. Could it really make that big
of a difference? Should I consider modding the circuit so that the
bias is adjustable?
Thanks,
Eric
Fox's Mercantile <jdangus@att.net>: Jul 20 11:30AM -0500

> Could it really make that big of a difference? Should I
> consider modding the circuit so that the bias is adjustable?
 
Yes
 
 
 
--
"I am a river to my people."
Jeff-1.0
WA6FWi
http:foxsmercantile.com
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to sci.electronics.repair+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

No Response to "Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 5 updates in 1 topic"

Post a Comment