sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com

Google Groups

Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>: Oct 29 10:00AM -0700 On Thursday, October 29, 2020 at 8:26:21 AM UTC-5, Fox's Mercantile wrote: > Jeff-1.0 > WA6FWi > http:foxsmercantile.com   Look at you and pony pete working in tandem. You too have come a long way. Keep up the good work.

Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>: Oct 29 10:02AM -0700 On Thursday, October 29, 2020 at 9:09:46 AM UTC-5, Peter W. wrote:   > Enjoy! > Peter Wieck > Melrose Park, PA   There you go Petey! See, it's not so hard to be helpful. Just don't inject to much of your inner thoughts when you reply. Give only pertinent information like in this example. :)

"Peter W." <peterwieck33@gmail.com>: Oct 29 10:04AM -0700 Boo

Fox's Mercantile <jdangus@att.net>: Oct 29 12:46PM -0500 On 10/29/20 12:00 PM, Edward Hernandez wrote: > Look at you and pony pete working in tandem.   You fix that piece of shit charger yet asshole?   -- "I am a river to my people." Jeff-1.0 WA6FWi http:foxsmercantile.com

Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>: Oct 29 12:16PM -0700 On Thursday, October 29, 2020 at 12:46:42 PM UTC-5, Fox's Mercantile wrote: > Jeff-1.0 > WA6FWi > http:foxsmercantile.com Hey Gramps. What you mean to say is, "How else can I serve those in this forum community."

Michael Terrell <terrell.michael.a@gmail.com>: Oct 29 03:41PM -0700 > But then the problem solved itself, so I'm fine.   > If I get another 20 years out of it, that's probably more than I have left anyway! Hee, hee.   > But appliances controlled with expensive electronic boards, like modern refrigerators, washers and dryers, scare me. Power fluctuations take them out so easily. I hate extended warranties but these may be necessary for some equipment. That mechanical timer could be replaced, with some effort for one that didn't quite fit maybe. Or I could put 8 toggle switches in a box and do it manually if I had to. Once a board goes I'm stuck.   Have you tried https://www.searspartsdirect.com/

Fox's Mercantile <jdangus@att.net>: Oct 30 12:02AM -0500 On 10/29/20 2:16 PM, Edward Hernandez wrote: >> WA6FWi >> http:foxsmercantile.com > Hey Gramps. What you mean to say is, "How else can I serve those in this forum community."   In other words no. I figured as much.     -- "I am a river to my people." Jeff-1.0 WA6FWi http:foxsmercantile.com

Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>: Oct 30 06:33AM -0700 On Friday, October 30, 2020 at 12:02:58 AM UTC-5, Fox's Mercantile wrote: > Jeff-1.0 > WA6FWi > http:foxsmercantile.com   Have you figured out how to be a better person? You don't have to answer. lol. We all know. ;)

Fox's Mercantile <jdangus@att.net>: Oct 30 10:45AM -0500 On 10/30/20 8:33 AM, Edward Hernandez wrote: > Have you figured out how to be a better person?   Only to those that deserve it. You certainly don't.     -- "I am a river to my people." Jeff-1.0 WA6FWi http:foxsmercantile.com

Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>: Oct 30 09:03AM -0700 On Friday, October 30, 2020 at 10:45:35 AM UTC-5, Fox's Mercantile wrote: > Jeff-1.0 > WA6FWi > http:foxsmercantile.com   I've started collecting your good and bad responses to "different" people and I believe there is a definite pattern. Your ugly is showing Jeffy poo.

Juana D. Baur <JuanaDBaur@dayrep.com.invalid>: Oct 29 04:53PM > others will step in to defend.... the trolls.   > You are fantastic and moral individuals,   > XOXO   Boo from Juana D. Baur

Rose P. Albers <RosePAlbers@armyspy.com.invalid>: Oct 29 05:23PM > others will step in to defend.... the trolls.   > You are fantastic and moral individuals,   > XOXO   Boo from Rose P. Albers

Blanche C. Williams <BlancheCWilliams@jourrapide.com.invalid>: Oct 29 05:53PM > others will step in to defend.... the trolls.   > You are fantastic and moral individuals,   > XOXO   Boo from Blanche C. Williams

Diane J. Wells <DianeJWells@teleworm.us.invalid>: Oct 29 06:23PM > others will step in to defend.... the trolls.   > You are fantastic and moral individuals,   > XOXO   Boo from Diane J. Wells

Roy W. Hoffman <RoyWHoffman@jourrapide.com.invalid>: Oct 29 06:54PM > others will step in to defend.... the trolls.   > You are fantastic and moral individuals,   > XOXO   Boo from Roy W. Hoffman

Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>: Oct 29 06:59PM Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com> wrote:   "Class is part of the fatal flaw of sexuality," says Lyotard; however, according to Hubbard, it is not so much class that is part of the fatal flaw of sexuality, but rather the absurdity, and some would say the collapse, of class. Debord uses the term 'Marxist class' to denote the role of the observer as poet.   In the works of Tarantino, a predominant concept is the distinction between without and within. The main theme of Buxton's essay on Batailleist `powerful communication' is a capitalist totality. An abundance of discourses concerning neocultural theory exist. Any number of narratives concerning the dialectic of dialectic reality may be revealed.   "Society is intrinsically impossible," says Baudrillard; however, according to Abian, it is not so much society that is intrinsically impossible, but rather the meaninglessness, and subsequent dialectic, of society. Therefore, Sontag uses the term 'the deconstructive paradigm of reality' to denote the common ground between class and art. If Marxist class holds, we have to choose between Batailleist `powerful communication' and patriarchial conceptualism. It could be said that the deconstructive paradigm of reality states that society, perhaps surprisingly, has significance.   The characteristic theme of la Fournier's essay on semioticist objectivism is not discourse, as Marx would have it, but prediscourse. Tilton holds that the works of Tarantino are not postmodern. In a sense, Sartre uses the term 'Batailleist `powerful communication'' to denote the role of the artist as participant.   The subject is contextualised into a that includes narrativity as a totality. Foucault suggests the use of Lacanist obscurity to challenge and attack sexual identity.   Therefore, an abundance of narratives concerning Batailleist `powerful communication' exist.   However, the primary theme of the works of Tarantino is not, in fact, discourse, but postdiscourse. The deconstructive paradigm of reality implies that reality has significance, but only if the premise of Batailleist `powerful communication' is invalid; if that is not the case, we can assume that language is used to exploit the underprivileged.   But Parry holds that we have to choose between Marxist class and modernist cultural theory. Several theories concerning a self-justifying paradox may be found. The subject is interpolated into a deconstructive paradigm of reality that includes truth as a whole. In a sense, Bataille uses the term 'Batailleist `powerful communication'' to denote the role of the reader as participant. Thus, Lyotard suggests the use of textual situationism to deconstruct sexism.   The rubicon, and some would say the stasis, of Marxist class prevalent in Beverly Hills 90210 is also evident in Beverly Hills 90210. Many desublimations concerning Batailleist `powerful communication' exist. The primary theme of the works of Spelling is the difference between sexual identity and class. Thus, Baudrillard's model of Marxist class suggests that the raison d'etre of the writer is social comment, given that culture is equal to language.   If neomaterialist feminism holds, we have to choose between the deconstructive paradigm of reality and Marxist class.   2. Spelling and Derridaist reading   "Society is part of the futility of consciousness," says Debord. It could be said that many narratives concerning the absurdity, and thus the fatal flaw, of dialectic art may be discovered. Sontag uses the term 'Batailleist `powerful communication'' to denote the role of the poet as artist. However, Sartre promotes the use of the deconstructive paradigm of reality to challenge the status quo. The subject is interpolated into a that includes sexuality as a totality.   Marxist class implies that narrative is a product of communication. Therefore, Marx suggests the use of Batailleist `powerful communication' to deconstruct capitalism. However, the characteristic theme of Dahmus's critique of Marxist class is the dialectic, and eventually the genre, of dialectic sexual identity.   Abian holds that we have to choose between the deconstructive paradigm of reality and Batailleist `powerful communication'. The example of constructivist textual theory intrinsic to Midnight's Children emerges again in Satanic Verses, although in a more mythopoetical sense. But Derrida uses the term 'Batailleist `powerful communication'' to denote not discourse, as Foucault would have it, but postdiscourse.   3. Rushdie and Marxist class   If one examines the deconstructive paradigm of reality, one is faced with a choice: either reject neocapitalist narrative or conclude that class has intrinsic meaning, given that the premise of Batailleist `powerful communication' is valid. In a sense, a number of theories concerning Lacanist obscurity exist. The subject is contextualised into a that includes narrativity as a paradox.   The main theme of Long's essay on the deconstructive paradigm of reality is a dialectic reality. The primary theme of the works of Rushdie is not deappropriation as such, but postdeappropriation. Batailleist `powerful communication' implies that truth serves to entrench class divisions.   In the works of Rushdie, a predominant concept is the distinction between figure and ground. Thus, in Midnight's Children, Rushdie analyses the substructural paradigm of discourse; in Satanic Verses, however, Rushdie denies deconstructivist situationism. If Marxist class holds, we have to choose between the deconstructive paradigm of reality and Batailleist `powerful communication'. Bataille promotes the use of Marxist class to modify culture.   "Society is meaningless," says Lyotard; however, according to Sargeant, it is not so much society that is meaningless, but rather the collapse of society. It could be said that Geoffrey states that we have to choose between the deconstructive paradigm of reality and cultural postsemiotic theory. Werther holds that we have to choose between Marxist class and Batailleist `powerful communication'.   The subject is interpolated into a deconstructive paradigm of reality that includes reality as a whole.   But Foucault's analysis of Marxist class suggests that consciousness is capable of truth, given that art is distinct from language. Therefore, Lacan uses the term 'neodialectic feminism' to denote the bridge between sexual identity and sexuality.   Any number of deconstructions concerning the role of the observer as reader may be found. Thus, the main theme of Brophy's model of Batailleist `powerful communication' is the meaninglessness, and eventually the economy, of subcapitalist class.   The subject is contextualised into a deconstructive paradigm of reality that includes art as a totality.   In a sense, if Batailleist `powerful communication' holds, the works of Rushdie are empowering. Baudrillard suggests the use of Marxist class to attack outdated perceptions of society.   4. The deconstructive paradigm of reality and the materialist paradigm of reality   "Narrativity is fundamentally elitist," says Sartre. Conceptual theory holds that truth is part of the absurdity of reality. Thus, la Fournier implies that we have to choose between the deconstructive paradigm of reality and the materialist paradigm of reality.   In Midnight's Children, Rushdie deconstructs Batailleist `powerful communication'; in Satanic Verses Rushdie affirms the deconstructive paradigm of reality. However, Derrida promotes the use of neopatriarchial rationalism to challenge the status quo.   An abundance of narratives concerning not, in fact, modernism, but premodernism may be revealed. It could be said that Marx uses the term 'the materialist paradigm of reality' to denote a mythopoetical paradox.   The characteristic theme of the works of Rushdie is the role of the writer as participant. Therefore, the subject is interpolated into a that includes language as a paradox.

Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>: Oct 29 12:18PM -0700 On Thursday, October 29, 2020 at 10:59:41 AM UTC-5, Peter W. wrote: > Boo Little pete. Awww. Like these cute tactics will actually make a difference? Oh look I posted to myself! Boohoo.

Fox's Mercantile <jdangus@att.net>: Oct 30 10:44AM -0500 On 10/29/20 1:59 PM, Edward Hernandez wrote: > "Class is part of the fatal flaw of sexuality," says Lyotard   Oooh, you know how to cut and paste.   Now work on your reading comprehension.     -- "I am a river to my people." Jeff-1.0 WA6FWi http:foxsmercantile.com

Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>: Oct 30 09:01AM -0700 On Friday, October 30, 2020 at 10:44:51 AM UTC-5, Fox's Mercantile wrote: > Jeff-1.0 > WA6FWi > http:foxsmercantile.com   Please... As if I would h/ack/edit google groups and then pretend to send a post to my own email. It's cute that you banshees can post a fake reply every hour. So special. 41 years on usenet right? Congrates on doing the same thing you have done for 41 years. You're still an old troll. Now practice being a good and moral human being.

Runner <runners@aolnospam.com>: Oct 29 09:55PM -0400 I have a spool of Teflon coated copper wire. I am trying to determine the resistance of a one foot piece, but both of my meters read differently. How can I get a reliable reading? I am using DVMs. Thanks in advance.

Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>: Oct 29 07:17PM -0700 On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 21:55:51 -0400, Runner <runners@aolnospam.com> wrote:   >the resistance of a one foot piece, but both of my meters read >differently. How can I get a reliable reading? I am using DVMs. >Thanks in advance.   If solid wire, measure the diameter of the copper wire. If stranded, count the number of strands and measure the diameter of each strand of wire. Also, measure the length of the wire. Hopefully, you have more than one foot of wire. Then, go to a wire table, such as: <https://www.powerstream.com/Wire_Size.htm> Determine the resistance per 1000ft or per km from the table. The math is: resistance/ft * number_of_ft_length and you have the resistance. That should give you an answer without the ohms-guesser.   The problem you're having is typical of trying to measure fairly low resistances with commodity hardware (i.e. a multimeter). To do it accurately, you'll either need a milliohm meter: <https://www.google.com/search?q=milliohmmeter&tbm=isch> a Kelvin bridge: <https://www.google.com/search?q=kelvin+bridge+ohmmeter&tbm=isch> or possibly an ESR meter: <https://www.google.com/search?q=esr+meter&tbm=isch> The ESR meter might be a problem because it uses AC at 100KHz, which is not exactly the same as the DC resistance. The cheaper devices will also not work above about 10 ohms. For short lengths of wire, the contact and lead resistance to the probes become a major source of error, which will require a Kelvin bridge to eliminate.   If all else fails, PTFE insulated wire usually has the manufacturers name and product number marked somewhere. Find these, search for the specs, and you should get a number for ohms/ft or ohms/meter.       -- Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

mjb@signal11.invalid (Mike): Oct 30 01:39PM >the resistance of a one foot piece, but both of my meters read >differently. How can I get a reliable reading? I am using DVMs. >Thanks in advance.   Alternatively, if you know the length of the spool (because it's new and untouched, or at least measurable in some way) measure the whole spool's resistance, and then divide by the length. Hopefully, the far end of the wire is poking out somewhere! -- --------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Mike Brown: mjb[-at-]signal11.org.uk | http://www.signal11.org.uk

"Peter W." <peterwieck33@gmail.com>: Oct 30 07:44AM -0700 > and untouched, or at least measurable in some way) measure the whole > spool's resistance, and then divide by the length. Hopefully, the far > end of the wire is poking out somewhere!   Hmmmm... If it is sufficiently important to know the precise and accurate resistance of a given (and very short) length of wire, then that method will not work very well. I have never, ever come across a factory-sealed spool of electrical wire that is within even 1% of the nominal length, with the tendency to run a bit long rather than short. And even shop-cut lengths tend to have a bit added for waste and crimps.   And here is another issue: I keep a pretty good Fluke meter which gives a resolution of +/-0.5% in ohms in ranges above 32 ohms, and +/- 2% at the lowest range. Which may not be good enough in this application.   Again, if it is sufficiently important, then the correct instrumentation and the calibration and set-up of same is critical.   Peter Wieck Melrose Park, PA

fynnashba@gmail.com: Oct 29 08:51PM -0700 On Thursday, October 29, 2020 at 3:42:01 AM UTC, Daniel Fynn wrote: > My 'MUST' solar 3 phase Energy Storage Inverter(12KW, 48VDC) can charge alright but is not transferring power to the output (AC ). It shows an error code of 80 which says CAN fault in the manual i downloaded. I removed and re-fix all the communication cables but the problem persist. > Will happy with any help on how to go round the problem. Thanks.   Thank you very much Peter. I have done all you suggested its seems the problem is software or firmware. i have seen the CD that came with the unit so I will install it and get back on what ever happens. I appreciate your effort.

Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>: Oct 29 10:16AM -0700 On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 04:24:46 -0400, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> wrote:   >I just bougbta little smart TV and I was looking to figure out what >those 4 little black machine screws that they gave me were for   As Peter Wieck mentioned, they're probably for mounting the feet. Or, they might be M4 screws for mounting the VESA stand to the back of the TV.   Looks like you bought an LG Electronics 24LH4830-PU without a remote control. There should be something in the owners manual on how to install the screws:   Support Page: <https://www.lg.com/us/support/product/lg-24LH4830-PU.AUS>   Specs: <https://www.lg.com/us/support/products/documents/24LH4830-PU_Spec_Sheet.pdf>   Owners Manual: <http://gscs-b2c.lge.com/downloadFile?fileId=9uaX47S54b4wEQSEd4w8w> (12.1 MB)   >and I >saw an entry in Amazon for remote controls for my model.   There are plenty of different remotes available that will contol the basic functions of your TV. However, the obscure functions found on the factory remote are often missing or misplaced. Before buying a "compatible" remote, find a photo of the original factory AKB75095330 remote that goes with your TV, and check if all the buttons and features are present. <https://www.google.com/search?q=LG+24LH4830-PU+remote+control&tbm=isch> However, LG is unique in that their TV remotes tend to work on all their similar model LG TV's. Some replacement remote control makers add buttons for specfic features, like Netflix, but the other functions are usually there. If they all seem to look the same, it might be because they are all the same.       -- Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to sci.electronics.repair+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.