Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 18 updates in 3 topics

Runner <runners@aolnospam.com>: Nov 13 12:18PM -0500

> Since the resistance of copper goes up with temperature (R is ~ temperature)
> controlling the voltage might be best. (no thermal runaway)
> Are you using AC or DC power.
 
12 VDC.
 
AC might be easier, get a transformer
> (maybe filament transformer?) and drive it from a variac.
 
I had originally considered this, but variacs in general are not
isolated from the AC line and I felt I would have needed an additional
isolation transformer, something I don't currently have and they seem to
be quite costly.
 
> DC will be trickier ('cause that power has to go somewhere) and some
> PWM scheme might be the way to go. Or buy a variable DC supply...
> you can use it for electroplating when not staying warm. :^)
 
I am currently using the PWM controller with the DC lines to the
blanket. So far so good. I have been monitoring temperature of the
blanket wiring. It does get up to 180 F, but I am using a timer to
cycle the system on and off so that the blanket is not running
continuously. I'm not sure how much I will have to vary the duty cycle
yet as the house hasn't reached its wintertime lows, but the hope is for
a 33% time on and the rest off. Just have to wait and see. I'm
currently using a mechanical timer, but I may switch out to a
programmable one I have here.
 
 
> In general I'm wondering why not try a heating pad and a nice down
> comforter?
 
I did this several years ago. No heating pad, but two stacked down duck
filled comforters. I still have this set up on the bed in the other
room. Took a long time to heat up, but once warm I couldn't cool down
so ended up having to turn a box fan on at full blast at 3 AM in a 47 F
bedroom! I suppose I could set the fan up on a timer to do this
automatically, never thought of that.
 
"Peter W." <peterwieck33@gmail.com>: Nov 13 09:36AM -0800

https://www.amazon.com/long-hot-water-bottle/s?k=long+hot+water+bottle
Has the ability to provide a short-term boost without the worry about duty-cycles and such.
No controllers, timers or other needlessly complex devices.
 
My wife and I like a cold room, but we temper that with the number of permitted pets on the bed. We have 180 pounds of available pets, being 95/25/20/20/20 (Golden/Scottie/Maine Coon/Main Coon/Main Coon Mix). And where the expression "Three dog night" came from.
 
Once again, demonstrating that this venue exists to provide needlessly complex solutions to otherwise simple problems using the most obscure means-and-methods presented with the maximum amount of obfuscation using as many words as possible.
 
Peter Wieck
Melrose Park, PA
Three Jeeps <jjhudak4@gmail.com>: Nov 13 10:08AM -0800

On Saturday, October 31, 2020 at 12:17:38 AM UTC-4, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
> 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
> Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
> Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
 
Just to add a bit of information to this guidance, joining nichrome wire to nichrome or copper can be a bit of a challenge if you are not aware of the metallurgy issues. It does not solder with lead free rosin core solder. Connections to nichrome wire are often done with a crimp style connector. This may not be a workable solution for an electric blanket, depending on the area where the splice is applied.
Nichrome can be soldered but you need a acid type flux and the degree of success is somewhat dependent on the type of nichrome (A: has no iron and behaves like stainless steel, B: contains some iron and can be more easily soldered).
I've had good luck joining both types using Ruby fluid flux and in one case using flux for soldering copper pipe, e.g. plumbing flux. Some people have had good luck with 60/40 acid core flux but I have not tried it. My guess is that it would work better on C type nichrome.
I also have used a small tack welder but its not a common household or shop tool.
If you look on the web am sure you will find lots of alternatives.
J
Three Jeeps <jjhudak4@gmail.com>: Nov 13 10:12AM -0800

On Friday, November 13, 2020 at 1:08:12 PM UTC-5, Three Jeeps wrote:
> I also have used a small tack welder but its not a common household or shop tool.
> If you look on the web am sure you will find lots of alternatives.
> J
whoops - typo - I have used 60/40 acid core with some success...(sorry, wrong sentence when doing 3 things at once...)
J
legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca>: Nov 13 01:57PM -0500

On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 12:18:15 -0500, Runner <runners@aolnospam.com>
wrote:
 
>bedroom! I suppose I could set the fan up on a timer to do this
>automatically, never thought of that.
 
>> George H.
 
Why not use a proper thermostat?
 
I don't recommend electric blankets. For a multitude
of reasons.
 
Add or subtract blankets, as required.
 
RL
Fox's Mercantile <jdangus@att.net>: Nov 13 02:07PM -0600

On 11/13/20 12:57 PM, legg wrote:
> I don't recommend electric blankets. For a multitude
> of reasons.
 
I just bought a new one.
I turn it one 20-30 minutes before I go to bed.
I turn it off when I go to bed.
But when I go to bed, the bed is nice and warm.
Beats the shit out of laying there swearing for 15-20
minutes waiting for the bed to finally get warm.
 
 
--
"I am a river to my people."
Jeff-1.0
WA6FWi
http:foxsmercantile.com
Runner <runners@aolnospam.com>: Nov 13 03:41PM -0500

On 11/13/20 3:07 PM, Fox's Mercantile wrote:
> But when I go to bed, the bed is nice and warm.
> Beats the shit out of laying there swearing for 15-20
> minutes waiting for the bed to finally get warm.
 
If a Sunbeam, good luck keeping it working. I went through three in
five years before finally going the DIY route. I'm not sure what's
happened to them. I couldn't even get any of the ones I bought to last
out the season. I think it has something to do with the current circuit
they use and the blanket wiring. Growing up, my parents and I had their
blankets and they lasted 15 years before I unfortunately tossed them a
decade ago.
Runner <runners@aolnospam.com>: Nov 13 03:43PM -0500

On 11/13/20 1:57 PM, legg wrote:
>> automatically, never thought of that.
 
>>> George H.
 
> Why not use a proper thermostat?
 
With the blanket? Maybe, but not sure how to incorporate or what to use.
 
Fox's Mercantile <jdangus@att.net>: Nov 13 08:05PM -0600

On 11/13/20 2:41 PM, Runner wrote:
> they use and the blanket wiring.  Growing up, my parents and I had their
> blankets and they lasted 15 years before I unfortunately tossed them a
> decade ago.
 
My previous one was a Sunbeam, it went tits up after three years.
The new one is a Biddeford. Unlike the Subeam, it's soft and fuzzy.
 
 
--
"I am a river to my people."
Jeff-1.0
WA6FWi
http:foxsmercantile.com
Runner <runners@aolnospam.com>: Nov 13 09:16PM -0500

On 11/13/20 9:05 PM, Fox's Mercantile wrote:
>> tossed them a decade ago.
 
> My previous one was a Sunbeam, it went tits up after three years.
> The new one is a Biddeford. Unlike the Subeam, it's soft and fuzzy.
 
I didn't have much luck with Biddeford either. I tried one of their
heated mattress pads. It didn't last a season. Hopefully, you'll have
better luck with their blankets.
Runner <runners@aolnospam.com>: Nov 13 09:31PM -0500

On 11/13/20 1:12 PM, Three Jeeps wrote:
>> J
> whoops - typo - I have used 60/40 acid core with some success...(sorry, wrong sentence when doing 3 things at once...)
> J
 
I never did go with the nichrome wire. I have some, but used it three
years ago to make some telescope dew heaters. The idea was to wrap the
front of the telescope with nichrome embedded in a fabric with just
enough wattage to keep dew away. Works great at 5 to 10 watts. For
that I believe I crimped it to the supply wires. When I started on the
blanket, there was no way I was going to try using nichrome for
something that large and went with some 22 ga Teflon coated wire I had
around for years. So far, it has been working out well. I can get up
to 80 watts, but I will mostly be running at half that or a little over
as there's much less heating to deal with. Today, the dimmer arrived
and I tried out a jacket I also wired. It too reaches 80 watts but
again I will only need about 50. 80 watts seems a bit too much even in
a cold house.
 
Initially, to hold the Teflon wiring in place, I used hot glue.
However, when 80 watts passed through, some of it began to not only
outgas but melt so I removed all of it and went with nylon ties. I
first tested the nylon and a bit of blanket fabric by heating in the
oven at 90 C for several hours and both came out fine. I was a bit
concerned as nylon seems advertised to hold well up to like 85 C, but I
don't see any issues.
 
Only other issue was temperature. The longer the blanket is on at the
max, the warmer it slowly creeps up. So, I have to either run it at
less power, which I will normally do, or have a duty cycle using a
timer. I have since incorporated a timer for when it gets colder in
here. I'm going to try for a 33% time on and 2/3 time off and see how
it goes. Someone has suggested a thermostat, but not sure how other
than maybe using a probe attached to the blanket wires and then a relay
turns the blanket on and off as needed.
"ohg...@gmail.com" <ohger1s@gmail.com>: Nov 14 03:47AM -0800

On Friday, November 13, 2020 at 3:41:19 PM UTC-5, Runner wrote:
> they use and the blanket wiring. Growing up, my parents and I had their
> blankets and they lasted 15 years before I unfortunately tossed them a
> decade ago.
 
Sunbeam blankets don't flat out quit, they slowly get colder over time. Not sure why that is. It's like they're programmed to do so. Too bad because their controllers are great. I switched to their mattress pads and they get inert over two or three seasons. Looking for another option right now.
Runner <runners@aolnospam.com>: Nov 14 10:57AM -0500

>> blankets and they lasted 15 years before I unfortunately tossed them a
>> decade ago.
 
> Sunbeam blankets don't flat out quit, they slowly get colder over time. Not sure why that is. It's like they're programmed to do so. Too bad because their controllers are great. I switched to their mattress pads and they get inert over two or three seasons. Looking for another option right now.
 
Exactly right, don't just quit but lose warmth over time. Out of the
three Sunbeam blankets I owned and two heated throws, they all did this.
This was my main inspiration for my DIY revamping. There's actually a
fair amount of online info on the Sunbeams if you do a patent number
search. A circuit block will come up along with at least one schematic.
I thought the culprit might have been a small SMD voltage sampling
transistor inside the little box where the cord plugs into the blanket,
but replaced that and still no heating. I also swapped out controllers
for a different one to no avail. So, that left the blanket itself. I
suspect the changing of wire resistance from repeated heating is what
does it and of course there's no solution without either a revamping as
I have done, or a new blanket.
 
Patent numbers show that someone definitely designed their latest
circuitry. IMHO, probably due to lawsuits and other worries from the
past, it was overdesigned and thus now stops working after short order.
There is no easy solution unless one wants to try other brands and take
a chance that you might come across one that actually keeps working.
legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca>: Nov 13 01:49PM -0500

>of current indicated per voltage be used simultaneously (in other words,
>can I use say 12V @ 13A & 5V @ 19A at the same time) or are the maximum
>(or near max) currents available for one voltage only at a time?
 
For UL or CSA safety rated power supplies, the combined output
powers shouldn't exceed the continuous output power rating of
the product, as written on the label carrying the certification
marking.
 
The unit is safety tested with any/all combination of continuous
output channel powers that can occur below the total power rating
for the unit.
 
Individual outputs are good for their labelled C x V rating.
If there is a special pulsed limit for an output, it should
be documented on it's spec sheet, but this need not show up on
labelling. A minimum load condition may be specified to
maintain the expected regulated output voltage.
 
You'll get longer life out of the unit if you keep a derating
on average loads, keep design air flow levels unrestricted
and minimize the number of times the input power is cycled.
 
RL
Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>: Nov 13 06:01PM -0800

>powers shouldn't exceed the continuous output power rating of
>the product, as written on the label carrying the certification
>marking.
 
Yep.
 
>The unit is safety tested with any/all combination of continuous
>output channel powers that can occur below the total power rating
>for the unit.
 
Yes, but not any/all combination, but rather whatever the manufacturer
declares to be safe. For example, if the power supply shares the +5V
and +3.3V circuitry, the maximum total power will be whatever the
circuit can handle. Example of such a nightmare specification:
<https://hardwareinsights.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/PSI-Label.jpg>
The +5V and +3.3V share quite a bit of circuitry. The labels says
that the total simultaneous dissipation for the two sections is 130
watts. Yet, if I calculate the maximum for each section, I get:
3.3V * 22A = 72.6W
5V * 16A = 80.0W
==============
Total = 153W
which is more than the rated 130 watts. Same with the other sections
on the chart. If I add together all the outputs:
3.3V * 22A = 72.6W
5V * 16A = 80.0W
12V1 * 15A = 180W
12V2 * 16A = 192W
-12V * 0.8A = 9.6W
5VSB * 2.5A = 12.5W
===============
Total = 547W
which is more than the rated total output of 500 watts.
 
 
--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca>: Nov 14 08:19AM -0500

On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 18:01:43 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
wrote:
 
> ===============
> Total = 547W
>which is more than the rated total output of 500 watts.
 
Where the label specifically gives grouped power ratings,
they should be followed.
 
The same goes with any other grouped rating, including
the rating for the full power supply, 500W.
 
Users are seldom provided with such detailed ratings
info on the actual label, suggesting that this unit is
marketed as a stand-alone product for evaluation/use
by lower-volume end-user/developers.
 
Safety testing will have evaluated those ratings as
listed on the label, under any worse-case shift of load.
It can be time consuming to do so, but may reduce the
actual part cost to the mfr, in the long run.
 
Too much information often indicates a not-very-rugged
design, but in cost-critical markets, this is seldom
a deciding factor.
 
RL
"Peter W." <peterwieck33@gmail.com>: Nov 13 08:55AM -0800

> Can this longer
> thermocouple's ends be cut off and be replaced with the same type of U
> interface that the current one uses?
 
Short answer is Yes, they *can* be cut off. More on this later. It seems like a lot of work for a dubious outcome.
But first: Verify that the extended TC device will provide accurate information to that device. This is not certain.
And also: Unless the entire environment is under difficult conditions, what about using conventional wire to extend the shorter probe?
Again, verify that such an extension will still allow accurate information to get to the device.
And, lastly, why not adapt to that plug. Use a couple of appropriately sized insulated push-on connectors to short spade-lugged jumpers. This being after you verify that it provides accurate information. Even better, if the spacing is correct, use crimp-on spade lugs directly onto the plug tines.
 
Remember, this venue exists in order to provide the most difficult and complex solutions to otherwise simple problems in the most obscure and irretrievably awkward way.
 
Peter Wieck
Melrose Park, PA
Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com>: Nov 13 06:30PM -0800

ABC_D wrote:
 
================
 
> The problem is that the connecting leads don't match. Can this longer
> thermocouple's ends be cut off and be replaced with the same type of U
> interface that the current one uses? Thank you.
 
 
** Buy a K type socket and use that.
 
https://au.element14.com/labfacility/am-k-ff/socket-k-ansi-mini-fascia/dp/2347130
 
Anything else will introduce errors due to contact potential effects
 
...... Phil
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to sci.electronics.repair+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

No Response to "Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 18 updates in 3 topics"

Post a Comment