Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 6 updates in 4 topics

KenW <ken1943@invalid.net>: Dec 04 09:09AM -0700

On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 11:00:07 -0500, Ralph Mowery
>good. It is not just one ham receiver,but several.
 
>My theory is that the portable receiver is matched for a high impedance
>short antenna, where the ham receiver is matched for a 50 ohm antenna.
 
Amateur Radio equipment is built to favor ham frequencies and not
broad banded like your general equipment.
 
 
KenW
Ralph Mowery <rmowery28146@earthlink.net>: Dec 04 11:00AM -0500

While not really a repair,but more of a question.
 
Why is it that I have one of the portable receivers with a whip antenna
that is about 2 feet long and can receive very well the short wave
stations, but my ham receiver with a couple of feet of wire on the back
receives almost nothing. When I hook the normal antenna to it, it
receives vey well. The signal generator shows the sensitivity is very
good. It is not just one ham receiver,but several.
 
My theory is that the portable receiver is matched for a high impedance
short antenna, where the ham receiver is matched for a 50 ohm antenna.
OJ Oxford <bestnet@none.com>: Dec 04 08:36AM -0500

My former post was on the unwanted heating up of a cigarette lighter and
it was determined that there was too much resistance in such a
connector, so switched out to the XT60 based mainly on Jeff Liebermann's
recommendation. I initially had great difficulties with my various
soldering irons on hand heating up both the connector and the 12 ga
copper wires enough to get an acceptable connection, so proceeded to
order a brand new 60 watt temp controlled iron and some flux. Well, I'm
happy to report that all is well. I have been pleasantly surprised by
how well the combination of the iron and flux are working and all
connections, while still delayed a bit, are being satisfactorily made
and I no longer have lack of connection, melting, or cold solder
concerns. Oh, and I have been working with silver solder too as the
standard had not yet arrived.
 
Apparently, my other irons on hand either didn't have the correct tips,
were too old to heat up correctly and/or lacking the additional flux all
worked to disadvantage. I must say that this 60 watt iron heats up
faster than any of my other irons. It is a pencil type and ready to go
in about 15 seconds, where my other pencil units always took several min.
 
Thanks again to the group for setting me straight.
Fox's Mercantile <jdangus@att.net>: Dec 04 09:16AM -0600

On 12/4/20 7:36 AM, OJ Oxford wrote:
> Thanks again to the group for setting me straight.
 
Not all of us give bad advice just to see our name in print.
 
 
--
"I am a river to my people."
Jeff-1.0
WA6FWi
http:foxsmercantile.com
Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>: Dec 04 07:54AM -0800

On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 08:36:01 -0500, OJ Oxford <bestnet@none.com> wrote:
 
Thanks for the update. Some minor comments.
 
>I initially had great difficulties with my various
>soldering irons on hand heating up both the connector and the 12 ga
>copper wires enough to get an acceptable connection,
 
More correctly, those were soldering guns, which I consider to be a
really bad idea for soldering XT60 connectors.
 
>I have been working with silver solder too as the
>standard had not yet arrived.
 
Silver alloy solder melts at about the same temperature as 63/37
lead/tin solder. However, 50/50 melts at about 25C higher
temperature. Be sure to adjust the temperature of your new soldering
iron depending on which solder you are using. Also, try not to mix
solders. You can mix 50/50 and 63/37, but not either of these and
lead free RoHS (tin/silver/copper) solders. I'm not sure about mixing
with silver solder. If you get a solder connection that is dull and
not shiny, clean off as much of the solder as possible and start over
with solder and flux until you get a shiny connection.
 
>I must say that this 60 watt iron heats up
>faster than any of my other irons. It is a pencil type and ready to go
>in about 15 seconds, where my other pencil units always took several min.
 
My guess(tm) is the lack of a temperature controlled soldering iron
was the main contributor to your soldering problem because the copper
wire was drawing away all the heat from the joint.
 
If your other pencil irons (or soldering guns) took several minutes to
heat up, they were probably not temperature controlled. When I
learned to solder about 65 years ago, all I could buy were
non-temperature controlled soldering irons. At the time wood burning
art kits were popular. Make a "painting" with a piece of wood and a
wood burning iron. Later, I graduated to essentially the same irons,
but made for electronics. It was perhaps 20 years later, that I was
introduced to a proper temperature controlled soldering iron. The
difference was amazing. The temperature controlled iron (Weller
TC-201T) had a "magnastat" thermostat in the iron to control the
temperature. Unlike the non-temp controlled iron, the iron could
produce far more watts than needed to heat the tip, and regulate the
temperature with the thermostat. The non-temp regulated iron had to
dissipate the exact amount of watts necessary for the tip to stabilize
at the desired temperature.
 
Another advantage is a temp controlled iron will not cool down (much)
when the tip is touched to the work. The thermostat senses the drop
in temperature, and increases the current to the heating element to
compensate. Such a temp drop is likely when soldering large gauge
copper wire, which acts as an excellent heat sink to draw heat away
from the joint.
 
 
--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
Stu jaxon <stankowalski02@gmail.com>: Dec 03 03:47PM -0800

> > > Model number means nothing on these "RCAs". Post the board numbers.
> > rca fre01m3393lna35-a2 main board.. power supply re46hq0602-20141105
> Most of that series has a corrupt UL2 eeprom. I have the .bin file if you have a programmer.
 
nope, no programmer. is there a way to test the eeprom pins with a scope or multimeter???
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to sci.electronics.repair+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

No Response to "Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 6 updates in 4 topics"

Post a Comment