Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 10 updates in 3 topics

Rob <nomail@example.com>: Jan 08 02:18PM

>> theory.  Then you'll be better informed.  Sincerely,
 
> Smart-arses trying to explain why omni doesn't actually mean omni...
> sigh. Some people are just born to be d*ckheads
 
Like you.
bilou <bilou@sfr.fr>: Jan 07 06:04PM +0100

On 06/01/2021 21:51, Cursitor Doom wrote:
> At that value it would be a supercapacitor I'd imagine. Were they
> installing those in new equipment 10 years ago?
Sure for memory function but for any active function,like RTC,
batteries are still mostly used.
Chuck <chuck23@dejanews.net>: Jan 07 12:25PM -0600

On Thu, 07 Jan 2021 14:26:06 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@noreply.com>
wrote:
 
>wrote:
 
>>The .47 to 1F caps have been used for 30 years in stereo receivers.
 
>I'm suitably amazed. Mind you I've never had much to do with them.
Come to think of it, a Denon tuner that I bought in 1988 has a super
capacitor for memory.
legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca>: Jan 07 01:33PM -0500

On Wed, 06 Jan 2021 20:51:28 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@noreply.com>
wrote:
 
>>upc.
 
>At that value it would be a supercapacitor I'd imagine. Were they
>installing those in new equipment 10 years ago?
 
They were showing up as surplus 20 years ago.
 
RL
Cursitor Doom <cd@noreply.com>: Jan 07 11:35PM

>>installing those in new equipment 10 years ago?
 
>They were showing up as surplus 20 years ago.
 
>RL
 
 
Well I can't understand in that case why there are so few of them
listed on Ebay currently. I may have to imrovise here and go back to
my initial idea of using a lithium button cell in series with a diode
to prevent it being charged.
 
Anyone see any issues with that approach?
Cursitor Doom <cd@noreply.com>: Jan 07 11:37PM

On Thu, 07 Jan 2021 12:25:54 -0600, Chuck <chuck23@dejanews.net>
wrote:
 
 
>>I'm suitably amazed. Mind you I've never had much to do with them.
>Come to think of it, a Denon tuner that I bought in 1988 has a super
>capacitor for memory.
 
Hmmm. I think clearly the older one gets, the harder it is keeping up
to date with new innovations if you're not fully immersed in the field
as a career (I'm not!)
"Peter W." <peterwieck33@gmail.com>: Jan 08 03:51AM -0800

> Anyone see any issues with that approach?
 
Yes. Purchasing anything of that nature from eBay is an issue. Given that a counterfeit - not unknown from that source - could destroy your unit.
 
Peter Wieck
Melrose Park, PA
Three Jeeps <jjhudak4@gmail.com>: Jan 07 11:00AM -0800

On Thursday, July 30, 2020 at 2:36:58 PM UTC-4, Martin James Smith wrote:
> future, what would it be?
 
> cheers,
 
> MS
Is long term reliability the only criteria? If so, I suggest toyota corolla or prius hybrid.
I recently went through a new vehicle search and reliability, safety, fuel efficiency , usable space and creature comforts were my primary criteria (roughly in that order). I consulted lots of different reviews and tried to get repair types and numbers. I ended up getting a toyota highlander hybrid limited. (@ 36 MPG). The subaru ascent and audi q5 (and 7) were fairly serious contenders. I did look at hundi and kia (sorento). They both got high marks as well but no hybrid models. Same for the subaru ascent. In the end, hybrid/fuel efficiency sorta drove my thinking.
I did look at e-vehicles but from my perspective, they arn't 'quite there yet'...
 
I did drive a 2021 Prius as a test (as long a I was looking). That is why I endorse it.
Now if you are a DIY repair person, a hybrid may be out of your comfort zone. I have been downloading the toyota FSMs for my vehicle for the last 24 hrs...trying to understand the basics of the propulsion system and even found a crude simulink model of the electronic drive - ICE tandem to play with.
Lots of computer power in a hybrid, and being a CE & EE, I am hoping they employed good sw rel and defect detection practices in their design (Since I teach this stuff I am always a bit curious how companies do it).
If an EMP hits, I'll be going nowhere but I'll take my chances.....
good luck
J
Three Jeeps <jjhudak4@gmail.com>: Jan 07 11:16AM -0800

On Saturday, August 1, 2020 at 8:43:18 PM UTC-4, Tim Schwartz wrote:
 
> Best regards,
> Tim Schwartz
> Bristol Electronics
I've owned 4 jeeps (grand Cherokees) over the last 25 years. Each model suffered from a unique set of component reliability issues...took me a while to finally ditch them. I live in the rust belt and was appalled to see my last vehicle significantly eaten away by rust in combination with nagging brake issues and the infamous death wobble (DW) due to their 'unique' front steering design.
An interesting story - a few years after Daimler bought Chrysler I was at the dealer parts desk getting some factory only fasteners and crankshaft position sensor. The parts fellow had a hell of a time finding the right fasteners in the system. He related the story to me that one of the first things Daimler did was look across all the Chrysler vehicles and inventoried the fastener types. Something on the order of 150K+ different ones. To save a bunch of money, Daimler standardized the fasteners across all the products down to something like 30K (numbers aren't accurate but the percentage reduction is, afaicr).
Three Jeeps <jjhudak4@gmail.com>: Jan 07 11:21AM -0800

On Tuesday, August 4, 2020 at 8:19:13 AM UTC-4, Peter W. wrote:
> Does not believe in Evolution (42% creationism, 32% evolution, 26% no opinion).
> Peter Wieck
> Melrose Park, PA
Am curious - can you please cite the source and year of these statistics?
thanks
J
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to sci.electronics.repair+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

No Response to "Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 10 updates in 3 topics"

Post a Comment