- Source for 784 MHz crystals? - 6 Updates
- Faulty SMPSU. - 1 Update
| Rob <nomail@example.com>: May 22 05:10PM >> There is no need to be that offensive, Phil. > ** FFS did you *fucking* read the vile shit that was posted about me by the resident moronic assholes here ???? > Are you totally BLIND !!!!!! Into the killfile you go (PLOINK as they say)... Goodbye! |
| Phil the Idiot <phil@idiot.invalid>: May 22 06:53PM >> replies and not direct to the original posting. > ** FYI I have posting on usenet for over 20 years - so I damn > well know the rules. If that is the case, then how can you not have learned that Usenet is a "party line"? > My comment was to *one* person, hoping he would reply in order to > explain himself. You cannot post to "*one* person" on Usenet. You can only post a follow-up to an article, and that follow-up is *read by all* readers of the group (i.e., a "party line") and can be further followed up by anyone who wishes to do so. To send something to "just one person" you have to use email. How can you have been posting to Usenet for 20 years and not have learned this fact? |
| "Peter W." <peterwieck33@gmail.com>: May 22 12:13PM -0700 > How can you have been posting to Usenet for 20 years and not have > learned this fact? Phil has never been overly burdened by facts. They get in the way of its carefully managed world view. Peter Wieck Melrose Park, PA |
| Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com>: May 22 05:09PM -0700 Some Fuckwit wrote: ======================= > >> There is no need to be that offensive, Phil. > >> This is usenet, threads have a tree structure where people reply to > >> replies and not direct to the original posting. ** WRONG !! One can reply to the OP over and over, ignoring all others. > > ** FYI I have posting on usenet for over 20 years - so I damn > > well know the rules. > If that is the case, ** The case is that YOU don't. > > My comment was to *one* person, hoping he would reply in order to > > explain himself. > You cannot post to "*one* person" on Usenet. ** Yes you can, by directing a question or thought to them. It's then up to them to reply. Others have no fucking idea what the OP is needing or thinking and ought not attempt to reply for them. > To send something to "just one person" you have to use email. ** True, but irrelevant. > How can you have been posting to Usenet for 20 years and not have > learned this fact? ** Cos is it simply not a fact. Questioning and drawing out an OP is essential to providing useful answers to them. FYI: Only *complete fools* treat OP's questions as if they had appeared on some exam paper. Only *complete fuckwits* complain about others who get it right. ..... Phil |
| "Peter W." <peterwieck33@gmail.com>: May 22 06:01PM -0700 When the Drongo from Down-Under is wrong, it spins like an Iranian centrifuge. Getting very little done but with much fuss and blather. Altogether worthless. Peter Wieck Melrose Park, PA |
| Mikko OH2HVJ <mikko.syrjalahti@nospam.fi>: May 23 10:21AM +0300 > Put an Si5351 and an ATTiny on a little board and it'll probably be > smaller than your broken rock, and cost a fraction of the price. SiT1576 would be even better, albeit in CSP package and need the programming tool. But then it needs no additional MCU and needs only around 15 uA for the 784 kHz. -- mikko |
| whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>: May 22 06:07PM -0700 On Saturday, May 22, 2021 at 2:31:00 AM UTC-7, T i m wrote: > Coming back to this before buying / replacing the switcher, I tested > it out of circuit on my DMM (diode test, all ways etc) and it seemed > to check out ok? They almost always fail with a dead short, couldn't miss that with a diode check ( 0.2 to 0.8V is a typical good-rectifier reading forward, and no conduction in reverse). > FWIW I measure about 10V DC on the output (no load) and only about .5V > on the AC range Since the capacitors on output were replaced, are you sure they're low-ESR types? The ripple current ratings have to add up to about the output (20A) of the unit. Correct capacitance but low ripple current ratings (aka high ESR) on the replacements could explain bad output with good rectifier. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to sci.electronics.repair+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No Response to "Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 7 updates in 2 topics"
Post a Comment