Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 11 updates in 3 topics

legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca>: Sep 12 01:09PM -0400


>Decided winter is still too far away to live with this idiotic flaw.
>http://www.eevblog.com/forum/reviews/the-dumbest-design-flaw-i've-seen-in-a-while/msg1023011/#msg1023011
>Fixed.
 
No clicks or pops at turn-on....?
 
RL
jurb6006@gmail.com: Sep 12 10:18AM -0700

>"A handheld digital meter with 'power saving' issues an audible >warning beep when it has decided to save power due to inactivity, >although it is serving it's function with a non-zero or non/overange >display. Nothing you do subsequently will prevent the shut-off, >except recycling the power before it happens."
 
I like my old Fluke. Mechanical power switch, but then again it runs off the mains, not a battery. You would think they have the technology to detect if there is something connected to the probes but the fact is that new engineers don't know shit and even if they do have never serviced anything in their life or even done any product testing.
 
Now CROs on the other hand might benefit from something that will at least turn down the beam current in the absence of a signal. That would save it from screen burn. Some of them had writing speed enhancers so they already had most of the circuitry. But they don't make CROs anymore, much to my dismay. I prefer them alot. The LCD scopes might have the bandwidth and features but if they only update the display ten times a second they would be useless for much servicing, I need to see it NOW when something is going into shutdown or whatever. Bunch of junk as far as I am concerned. Well, OK I never used a really high end one but I ain't spending $400,000 for a machine that is used to fix the cheap shit I fix and is susceptible to viruses and needs software updates. Fuck all that.
 
Anyway, all you on here might enjoy a look once in a while at a website called "Made By Monkeys" which, while updated infrequently, has stories about shitty designs and engineering gaffs and the like. There are a few interesting posts there, and I have not gone all that far back in their archives, so there might be more interesting stuff.
Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net>: Sep 12 01:22PM -0400

On 09/12/2016 12:13 PM, legg wrote:
> is serving it's function with a non-zero or non/overange display.
> Nothing you do subsequently will prevent the shut-off, except
> recycling the power before it happens.
 
I have about 8 of them, and none do that. You just turn the range switch.
 
Cheers
 
Phil Hobbs
 
 
--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
 
160 North State Road #203
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
 
hobbs at electrooptical dot net
http://electrooptical.net
JW <none@dev.null>: Sep 12 01:57PM -0400

On Mon, 12 Sep 2016 13:09:59 -0400 legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> wrote in
>>http://www.eevblog.com/forum/reviews/the-dumbest-design-flaw-i've-seen-in-a-while/msg1023011/#msg1023011
>>Fixed.
 
>No clicks or pops at turn-on....?
 
Nope.
legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca>: Sep 12 06:52PM -0400

On Mon, 12 Sep 2016 13:22:59 -0400, Phil Hobbs
 
>I have about 8 of them, and none do that. You just turn the range switch.
 
>Cheers
 
>Phil Hobbs
 
I have a lot of them that don't do it either, but at least one 4.5
digit hand-held and another multifuction 'tweezer' measurement unit
do-do it. Ain't nuthin' you can do abahd 't.
 
RL
krw <krw@nowhere.com>: Sep 12 07:31PM -0400

>>> Nothing you do subsequently will prevent the shut-off, except
>>> recycling the power before it happens.
 
>>I have about 8 of them, and none do that. You just turn the range switch.
 
That's no less annoying.
 
>I have a lot of them that don't do it either, but at least one 4.5
>digit hand-held and another multifuction 'tweezer' measurement unit
>do-do it. Ain't nuthin' you can do abahd 't.
 
Every one I've had does it. The range switch thing works, for small
values of "works". 'cept as you hint at, those that have no range
switch.
Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net>: Sep 13 10:22AM -0400

On 09/12/2016 07:31 PM, krw wrote:
 
> Every one I've had does it. The range switch thing works, for small
> values of "works". 'cept as you hint at, those that have no range
> switch.
 
My Tek ones allow you to disable it by holding down a button as you turn
the meter on. I think the Fluke 87 does too. (I bought mine in 1988.)
 
Cheers
 
Phil Hobbs
 
 
--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
 
160 North State Road #203
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
 
hobbs at electrooptical dot net
http://electrooptical.net
Ralph Mowery <rmowery28146@earthlink.net>: Sep 13 12:03PM -0400

In article <5Z-dnYBSZNMolkXKnZ2dnUU7-IWdnZ2d@supernews.com>,
pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net says...
 
.
 
> My Tek ones allow you to disable it by holding down a button as you turn
> the meter on. I think the Fluke 87 does too. (I bought mine in 1988.)
 
I don't know all the model numbers, but the Flukes I have will allow you
to keep them on by pressing a button when turned on.
makolber@yahoo.com: Sep 13 07:50AM -0700

tiny wire is inherently unreliable
 
adding a transformer and using 24V valves is a good idea.
 
or use 120V valves and wire the 2 in series instead of parallel?
 
m
legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca>: Sep 12 01:14PM -0400

On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 19:10:53 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
 
>Isn't it silly in the very beginning? :)
 
It can be and has been in the past.
 
particularly at the very beginning of the sw development....
 
Who's on first?
 
RL
JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net>: Sep 13 08:16PM +0700

On Mon, 12 Sep 2016 13:14:36 -0400, legg wrote:
 
> It can be and has been in the past.
 
> particularly at the very beginning of the sw development....
 
> Who's on first?
 
Are you telling me you haven't solved the chicken - egg problem, yet?
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to sci.electronics.repair+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

No Response to "Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 11 updates in 3 topics"

Post a Comment