Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 7 updates in 3 topics

The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com>: Jun 12 09:43AM -0700

On 06/11/2018 07:37 AM, micky wrote:
> were obvious but some a few were just little cracks. I think you could
> solder straight the "wires", the traces, but you'd have to scrape off
> the lacquer or whatever it's covered with.
 
Extremely nearsighted person examined whatever was visible and found
nothing cracked or broken, so I put it in a plastic bag to await
inspiration or the breakage of the one I'm using now.
 
Thanks, guys.
 
 
--
Cheers, Bev
"One's chances of winning the lottery are not appreciably
improved by actually buying a ticket."
Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>: Jun 11 01:44PM -0700

On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 03:03:50 +0000 (UTC), root <NoEMail@home.org>
wrote:
 
>> It works, but the plastic mechanism is very flexible
>> and I'm afraid I'm gonna break it with every ejection.
 
>Thanks for responding. I just ordered the HDCV-4 from NewEgg.
 
<https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIA8HV54A2408>
Except for the lack of ventilation, it looks ok.
 
>I do have a Kingwin Hot Swap Caddy that takes the 2.5 drive,
>but the caddies are no longer available from Kingwin.
 
Caddy? I just use the SSD with some folded over tape to help extract
it. The 4 side mounting brackets for the 2.5" drive act as guides. No
caddy needed.
 
Usually use this Rosewell adapter:
<https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816132098>
<https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816132098R>
 
 
--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com>: Jun 11 08:30PM -0400

In sci.electronics.repair, on Mon, 11 Jun 2018 13:44:37 -0700, Jeff
 
>Usually use this Rosewell adapter:
><https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816132098>
><https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816132098R>
 
How is it that vendors have so many open box items? It seems like once
in a while someone would send something back, so there could be one,
maybe 2 of something, but often I see whole webpages for individual open
box items
Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>: Jun 11 09:14PM -0700

On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 20:30:46 -0400, micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com>
wrote:
 
>in a while someone would send something back, so there could be one,
>maybe 2 of something, but often I see whole webpages for individual open
>box items
 
Newegg has their Premier plan, which offers both free returns and no
restocking fee:
<https://www.newegg.com/neweggpremier/>
So, people use it and Newegg gets stuck with a bunch of returns that
they unload for a discount.
 
Amazon Prime also offers free returns, but limits the returns to those
items fulfilled by Amazon:
<https://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=201532130>
 
 
 
--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com>: Jun 11 10:42PM -0700

On 06/11/2018 09:14 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
> <https://www.newegg.com/neweggpremier/>
> So, people use it and Newegg gets stuck with a bunch of returns that
> they unload for a discount.
 
Anybody remember DAC? Mail order place. Wonderful catalogs. They sold
slick inexpensive electronics/appliances. Their breadmakers were really
neat, and may have been the first 'affordable' ones. The bad thing was
DAC's liberal return policy, which resulted in everybody returning their
breadmakers after the thrill wore off maybe 1 or 2 months later. They
had a local store with an open-box section -- full of breadmakers. They
eventually went belly-up, which was sad. The guy tried to start back up
a few years later, but it didn't work out.
 
> Amazon Prime also offers free returns, but limits the returns to those
> items fulfilled by Amazon:
> <https://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=201532130>
 
Somewhere I read you can return Amazon stuff at Whole Foods stores,
which might or might not be more convenient than shipping it back.
 
--
Cheers, Bev
"A complete lack of evidence is the surest sign
that the conspiracy is working." -- Tanuki
Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>: Jun 11 12:43PM -0700

On Sat, 9 Jun 2018 18:02:00 -0700 (PDT), Phil Allison
>The FM signal is inherently wide band, with +/-75 kHz deviation at peak audio level - if the IF bandwidth is less than 150kHz, distorted sound is the result.
>I have a radio scanner ( AR 1000xlt ) with wide and narrow FM modes, 30kHz and 200kHz respectively. Listening to broadcast FM while in narrow mode is *intolerable*, in wide mode it sounds just fine.
>.... Phil
 
A bit of hair-splitting here. The FM channel allocation in the USA is
at 200 KHz intervals. However, if one adds the digital (HD Radio,
IBOC, iBiquity, etc) modulation, the bandwidth is now 400 KHz wide:
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In-band_on-channel>
This is what it looks like on a spectrum analyzer:
<http://www.learnbydestroying.com/jeffl/crud/KBRG-100_3.jpg>
<http://www.learnbydestroying.com/jeffl/crud/KCSM.jpg>
 
In most HD Radio receivers, the IF bandwidth is set by a digital
filter. For conventional FM, it's 200 KHz wide. For digital FM, it's
400 KHz wide. I suppose it could be front panel set by the user, but
methinks it makes more sense to have the IF bandwidth automagically
set by the mode and sub-channel.
 
Measuring Your IBOC Spectrum
<http://www.nautel.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/NAB-Measuring-Your-IBOC-Spectrum-David-Maxson.pdf>
 
--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
Michael Black <mblack@pubnix.net>: Jun 11 10:54PM -0400

On Sat, 9 Jun 2018, Phil Allison wrote:
 
 
> I have a radio scanner ( AR 1000xlt ) with wide and narrow FM modes,
> 30kHz and 200kHz respectively. Listening to broadcast FM while in narrow
> mode is *intolerable*, in wide mode it sounds just fine.
 
Continuously variable for FM doesn't make sense. But there have been some
FM tuners that could be switched between "wide" and "narrow", in relative
terms. So for strong signals, wider bandwidth is fine. But for weaker
signals, narrower bandwidth avoids interference from adjacent signals that
are stronger. It wasn't uncommon for FM DXers to swap the ceramic filters
in their FM receivers from the often 280KHz bandwidth to down about
180KHz, at one time one could go to a catalog and order Murata ceramic
filters in a range of bandwidths. If you don't need FM, you can get by
with narrower, though of course nt in the tens of KHz wide.
 
The scanner wants "narrow" for two way communication which is narrow
deviation, 10KHz or smaller in recent years. The wide is for broadcast FM
and maybe some other things, since yes, the "narrow" in this case is way
too narrow for FM broadcast. Of course, the wider bandwidth can be useful
for things like receiving weather satellites, which may have a wider
deviation of something like 40KHz, but also because of doppler shift, an
even wider bandwidth makes things easier. I know I've seen modifications
for scanners to use with weather satellites, and they bypass the narrow
filter at 455KHz, which leaves an FM broadcast band type ceramic filter at
the first IF of 10.7MHz.
 
There was a time twenty years ago when I was bringing home lots of Delco
car radios from garage sales. I'm not sure what the FM filter is in
there, but they certainly seemed to have better skirt selectivity than
other FM radios I'm familiar with. The AM filters seeemd sharper too.
 
Michael
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to sci.electronics.repair+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

No Response to "Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 7 updates in 3 topics"

Post a Comment