| Unlisted <unlisted@nomail.com>: Jun 04 08:19PM -0500 On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 11:40:52 +0200, Miguel Giménez <me@privacy.net> wrote: >> fees for a printed paper photocopy. I intend to keep and use this mixer. >Just in case other user needs them in a near future you can measure >secondary voltages and post them here. Yep, 36.8v across main winding or about 18v to centertap on each leg. The other winding which is just for an optional gooseneck light is about 15v. (For a light listed as 12v). But thats 15 v ac NO LOAD. |
| "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com>: Jun 04 06:35PM +0100 > Nope. >> We even got fibre to the home at 18% a year ago. > Not to all but a very few outlying areas you didn't. Look up the BT stats. That's where I got the numbers from. >> Pretty much everyone has fibre to the cabinet, > That's VDSL2+ We name it more recognisably. >> which is usually 40-80Mbit. > Mine will do 130Mb but I only pay for 50Mb. Mine will do 54 (long way to the cabinet over copper wire) but I pay for 38. > All of our new ones and plenty of existing houses > are fiber to the home and that will do 1Gb I dunno about new homes here, but I've seen a few people have it retro fitted. I bet when their next door neighbour asks for it, BT has to do fuck all to join it on, but charge them the same. > There is one wifi stream to each camera. >> What I meant was Wifi is shared is it not? Between all the cameras. > Not. Your WiFi access point will transmit at a certain speed, that's shared among all devices. Unless you have two access points on different channels, which is difficult as then neighbours start interfering. > real time turn by turn directions and traffic etc > when you are going somewhere you havent been > before for a gumtree or freecycle pickup etc. My Satnav does that. >>> Wrong, I use tech that I need or want. >> Most of what you have are gimmics. > Wrong. Still waiting for something useful. Your Alexa isn't for a start you lazy bugger. |
| "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>: Jun 05 04:51AM +1000 Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote >>> We even got fibre to the home at 18% a year ago. >> Not to all but a very few outlying areas you didn't. > Look up the BT stats. They say nothing like that. > That's where I got the numbers from. But you didn't understand that fiber to the cabinet isnt fiber to the home. >>> Pretty much everyone has fibre to the cabinet, >> That's VDSL2+ > We name it more recognisably. But you still couldn't work out that fiber to the cabinet isnt fiber to the home. >> Mine will do 130Mb but I only pay for 50Mb. > Mine will do 54 (long way to the cabinet over copper wire) but I pay for > 38. I can have 25 but prefer 50 for the higher upload speed, 20. You only get 5 with a 25 download speed. You can have 1Gb each way with fiber to the home which lots have. >> Not. > Your WiFi access point will transmit at a certain speed, that's shared > among all devices. Nope, they each get that speed. > Unless you have two access points on different channels, which is > difficult as then neighbours start interfering. Mangled again. >> when you are going somewhere you havent been >> before for a gumtree or freecycle pickup etc. > My Satnav does that. Google maps does it much better with you being able to do it by the name of the commercial operation and with real time traffic info as well. >>> Most of what you have are gimmics. >> Wrong. > Still waiting for something useful. You have got plenty in the past. > Your Alexa isn't for a start you lazy bugger. Google/nest is much better and you are just plain wrong. Only a fool switches stuff off when going to bed and on when getting up instead of saying "hey google, goodnight" and "hey google, good morning" and getting the weather forecast as well as the lights done. And don't try claiming that you can just look out the window, I get up in the dark. Same with the cooking timer for most meals, "hey google, timer 3" sets 3 timers at once. Alexa cant do that. |
| Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>: Jun 04 09:06PM +0200 On Sat, 5 Jun 2021 04:51:03 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: <FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic blather> -- Another typical retarded "conversation" between the two resident idiots: Birdbrain: "But imagine how cool it was to own slaves." Senile Rodent: "Yeah, right. Feed them, clothe them, and fix them when they're broken. After all, you paid good money for them. Then you've got to keep an eye on them all the time." Birdbrain: "Better than having to give them wages on top of that." Senile Rodent: "Specially when they make more slaves for you and produce their own food and clothes." MID: <fvlcdcFq2icU1@mid.individual.net> |
| T i m <news@spaced.me.uk>: Jun 04 10:52PM +0100 On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 15:08:46 +0100, Mike Coon <gravity@mjcoon.plus.com> wrote: >> Cycles don't go out of fashion quite like some electronics. ;-) >Maybe having a partner on the back will turn out to be a longer-lasting >fashion/niche than e-bikes... I guess for many an eBike could be just a novelty (especially when they leave the battery to die and go to get a new one) but I have a neighbour who regularly commutes on his eBike and for him it really is an essential tool. Tandems have their downsides, one big one being car drivers only seeing 'a cycle', going to overtake, find out it's going faster than they thought and then running out of road with a bollard in the middle of the road (often then cutting the tandem up rather than dropping back). ;-( Ours is more of an off-road tandem and it's generally much more entertaining there. ;-) Cheers, T i m |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to sci.electronics.repair+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No Response to "Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 5 updates in 2 topics"
Post a Comment