Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 22 updates in 6 topics

"Dave M" <dgminala@mediacombb.net>: Sep 22 10:53AM -0500

Dave M wrote:
> D'Arsonval movements have about 20-30% range on the
> mechancial zero adjustment, so yours might be a long stretch for this
> method. Never know till you try!! Dave M
 
 
I forgot to mention that for the zener solution, you really need to select
as low power a zener that you can find, such as 400mW or lower.
The 1N4104 is a 10V, 250mW zener, with a test current of 1uA, and a max
current of 25ma, well within your requirements. In stock at Mouser.com.
 
Cheers,
Dave M
Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>: Sep 22 10:22AM -0700

>It's what you do when you don't understand what you need, but you
>start building it anyway.
 
>If you need precision, you don't want an analog meter.
 
In college (about 1969), I build an "electronic slide rule" in the
form of an analog computer inside a brief case. Inside, it was two
log amps, a multiplier, range switch, and an anti-log amp. Input was
via two Bournes Helipot 10 turn pots (linearity 0.1%). Output was on
a mirrored scale analog panel meter about 6" in width. Accuracy was 3
decimal places in the lower part of the meter, and 2 decimal places
over the rest of the scale. However, I had to use temperature
compensation tables for the pots, multipliers, and amps to obtain that
level of accuracy.
 
What level of precision were you expecting?
 
--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
"Ian Field" <gangprobing.alien1@virginmedia.com>: Sep 22 08:27PM +0100

"T i m" <news@spaced.me.uk> wrote in message
news:e898schb0qaru15b36kmcfvrroth86grt6@4ax.com...
>>kind of power supply.
 
> Because the reference voltage will be too close to the minimum voltage
> expected Ian?
 
The TL431 is actually a comparator with its own built in 2.5V reference.
 
In closed loop operation, that's as low as the cathode goes - you can
saturate it in open loop operation, but "Vce-sat" is around 2V.
whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>: Sep 22 02:13PM -0700

On Thursday, September 21, 2017 at 10:51:33 AM UTC-7, T i m wrote:
 
> I was thinking of using either a voltage reference such as
> LM4040DIZ-10.0 or could I get away with a simple zener (BZX55C?) with
> associated resistor(s) please?
 
You can use any zener under 10V to do a 10V zero offset (just divide down the
input voltage until that 10V input matches the zener knee). So, with an
arbitrary zener (I'd use a TL431 as a 2.5V reference, they're convenient
and accurate) and a trimmer acting as voltage divider, it just remains
to make a range-setting resistor in series with the meter.
 
The important thing, is to doodle up a really nifty scale for your meter
that indicates 10V to 15V, with clear markings, along the pointer's arc,
maybe with a bunch of subdivision marks. Last time I did that, it took
a plotter and a bit of custom software to draw the arcs and labels,
then some fiddling with the faceplate of the meter to
affix it (warning: you need to worry about laser-print ink, paper, glue compatibility).
tabbypurr@gmail.com: Sep 22 03:38PM -0700

On Friday, 22 September 2017 05:05:35 UTC+1, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
 
> "The Windows programs for drawing analog meter scales"
> <http://www.tonnesoftware.com/meter.html>
> $35 for the full version.
 
fails to solve the issue AND adds pointless cost.
 
 
NT
tabbypurr@gmail.com: Sep 22 03:39PM -0700

On Friday, 22 September 2017 05:22:46 UTC+1, Foxs Mercantile wrote:
> > simple but time consuming producing a new dial paper
 
> With the low current Zener, it doesn't look like that will be
> necessary.
 
Oh, you've found a zener that's 10v +/- 1%?
 
 
NT
tabbypurr@gmail.com: Sep 22 03:45PM -0700

On Friday, 22 September 2017 05:42:36 UTC+1, mike wrote:
 
> >> End rant.
 
> > He's making a one off for use at home, not commissioning a new design of military hardware.
 
> The task is the same no matter who the customer.
 
Rubbish. For a large project all the specs have been calculated to meet the requirements, the contract gone through by a team of lawyers, and the task of the lec eng is to produce a circuit that meets all the given specs under all specified conditions.
 
For a one off at home the requirements are often not pinned down firmly, as in this case. There are no lawyers, no contract, and the elec eng's job is to trade off cost & complexity versus specs to find what turns out to be the most agreeable compromise for the client, oneself. In most cases this is a device that is much less tightly specced.
 
 
NT
tabbypurr@gmail.com: Sep 22 03:48PM -0700

On Friday, 22 September 2017 05:43:10 UTC+1, mike wrote:
> the precision measurement desired is never entered into
> any other system/program. The desired functionality
> could be obtained by a Sharpie mark or two on the face of the meter.
 
Indeed. This can be done in such a way to make it tidy. But the use of a zener means the scale will have to be calibrated, which is a waste of time, especially to get a nice neat result.
 
> It's what you do when you don't understand what you need, but you
> start building it anyway.
 
> If you need precision, you don't want an analog meter.
 
I see it's foolish claims day today.
 
 
NT
tabbypurr@gmail.com: Sep 22 03:57PM -0700

> On Thu, 21 Sep 2017 17:21:23 -0700, mike <ham789@netzero.net> wrote:
 
>Words like exactly, "as good as possible" have no place in a specification.
 
a common enough phrase for an in-house spec. Such phrases should be cleared up later of course, once the specifier knows what the engineers can actually do and what the options cost.
 
 
> >Specs are numbers and test methods. Specs include allowable
> >variations due to initial component tolerances, component age,
> >temperature, vibration, misuse.
 
Some do. Some are 'how can you get it as cheap as possible and still have it sell & not destroy our repuation.' Some are 'we want to beat what's out there, how good could you get it?' Some are 'we want it to do this.' etc etc etc.
 
 
> readings interpreting and so ITRW, we are 'most likely' to not require
> much in the way of precision or we wouldn't be using those things in
> the first place. ;-)
 
1% is doable for some analogue meters. That's enough precision for a lot of tasks.
 
 
NT
amdx <nojunk@knology.net>: Sep 22 08:13PM -0500


> Had I known, the "meter man" at Kutztown would have had exactly what you want in the size you want it, new or used. He has hundreds. Now you have to wait until spring.
 
> Peter Wieck
> Melrose Park, PA
 
I don't know if you are asking for an expanded scale meter, were the
0V line is 10V and FS line is 15 volts, so the whole range is only 5
volts. That's what I gleaned.
First you need to put a series 60K ohm resistor to make the meter read
FS with 15V applied. (for accuracy you should subtract the resistance of
the meter from the 60K ohms)
Then you need to add a circuit shown in these sites.
 
> http://www.radcomms.net/Expanded_Scale_Voltmeter.html
 
http://www.thebackshed.com/windmill/articles/ExpandedScaleVoltMeter.asp
 
> http://www.zbasic.net/forum/about1423.html
 
This last one will probably need a 10K resistor tied from one OUT to
the other OUT. Just so there is enough current to make the regulators
work properly.
 
Here's a youtube, I didn't watch it all, but you might learn something.
 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-z_j4MclCTk
 
Mikek
bruce2bowser@gmail.com: Sep 23 12:03AM -0700

mike wrote:
> >> End rant.
 
> > He's making a one off for use at home, not commissioning a new design of military hardware.
 
> The task is the same no matter who the customer.
 
At least the extra option should be there.
Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>: Sep 23 09:35AM -0700

>> $35 for the full version.
 
>fails to solve the issue AND adds pointless cost.
>NT
 
The consensus seems to be to use an expanded scale analog voltmeter.
If the OP is going to build such a thing, he needs a new scale on his
analog meter. That can be done with the free version of the software.
(I just checked and it will do an expanded scale).
 
I usually ignore one line pontifications, but I'm curious. Why does a
new meter scale fail to solve the issue? Ummm... what issue?
 
--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>: Sep 22 10:08AM -0700

On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 07:55:03 -0400, bitrex
 
>On 09/20/2017 08:56 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
(...)
>> refuses to allow a firmware downgrade.
 
>Thanks for the detailed reply! You can really brick Apple keyboads
>during a firmware update whaaaaat?!
 
Firmware upgrade didn't brick the keyboard, but killed a few keys.
 
It's been a few years and the keyboards were recycled long ago. Before
the upgrade, both wireless keyboards worked normally. Afterwards, the
BT KBD would work, but several keys were dead. Different keys on each
keyboard. I trashed one on my Mac Mini, while a customer trashed
theirs on some other Mac. I vaguely recall the firmware version as
1.4, but that might be incorrect.
 
The problem was not the failed firmware upload, but rather that Apple
does not allow firmware downgrades or reloading the same version that
is installed. This is just plain stupid as I could have recovered the
keyboard if either were allowed. I tried to find my postings to the
Apple forum on the topic, but failed. The user replies were not very
useful.
 
The reason that I mentioned it is that you will find Apple Aluminum BT
wireless keyboards at thrift shops with a few defective keys. In many
cases, new in the box. Everyone seems to assume that it's a
mechanical or liquid problem with the keyboard mechanics. However, I
believe it to be failed firmware upgrade problems similar to what I
experienced.
 
Caveat Emptor.
 
 
--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
Look165 <look165@numericable.fr>: Sep 22 08:21PM +0200

Generally, these devices are IR comunicating.
 
 
This needs an IR receiver on the PC.
 
 
 
bitrex a écrit :
Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>: Sep 23 09:30AM -0700

On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 20:21:41 +0200, Look165 <look165@numericable.fr>
wrote:
 
>Generally, these devices are IR comunicating.
>This needs an IR receiver on the PC.
 
Huh? IrDA has been essentially dead for at least 10 years. I haven't
seen a full size keyboard that uses IR for at least that long. Most
everything these days uses some form of wireless to communicate.
 
Well, not totally dead. It is still possible to buy an IR keyboard
today:
<http://www.dsi-keyboards.com/product-category/keyboards/wireless-keyboards/ir-infrared-keyboards/>
 
 
--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
Look165 <look165@numericable.fr>: Sep 23 06:35PM +0200

A question of cost efficiency and stock dumping.
 
IR is so simple to integrate.
 
...And it uses "big batteries" !
 
Jeff Liebermann a écrit :
micky <NONONOmisc07@bigfoot.com>: Sep 23 11:01AM -0400

I'm thinking of installing a Gromaudio device that, if your car radio
has a CD changer input jack, allows for USB input, AUX input from a
cellphone, and for another $50 Bluetooth use of the cellphone through
the car speakers and an add-on microphone (in addition to the first
$150).
 
The most important feature for me is the USB input.
 
Do any of you know anything good or bad about Grom audio? Do any of you
know a competitor you would recommend (instead?)?
 
For example, Crutchfield sells a similar device that is only $70 for
everything (except the microphone and I can't even figure out how to
plug a microphone in). But assuming a microphone would work, would you
assume the one that sells for $200 is better than the one that sells for
70?
 
 
I've read as many reviews as I can find, but I wanted your opinions, and
I wanted to let you know such things are available. I never heard of
them before 4 days ago.
 
Their webpages will tell you if your car factory radio is compatible.
They say they even retain the use of SWC, steering wheel controls.
 
There are one or two other companies that sell devices that have
everything but the USB input, and I found something on ebay that had
everything and was only $18. At that price it's worth trying it just in
case it works, but based on the pictures, I don't think I could find one
that fit my particular jack. Hmm. Now it says "Only 4 available" and
the price has gone up to $20.
ss.chelsc@gmail.com: Sep 23 06:16AM -0700

SIL patterns invariably have one end with a square solder pad. This just helps you recognize which end is which when you turn your board over. I don't think it has a functional significance.
Foxs Mercantile <jdangus@att.net>: Sep 23 08:24AM -0500

> SIL patterns invariably have one end with a square solder pad.
 
The square pad is simply identification.
Pin-1, Cathode, (+) etc.
 
 
 
--
Jeff-1.0
wa6fwi
http://www.foxsmercantile.com
Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>: Sep 22 09:54AM -0700


>Too much here to respond to,
 
Sorry. I was in a hurry and didn't have time to be brief.
Actually, I got interested in the topic and decided that it was worth
expounding in detail. Enjoy.
 
>but also consider that ePaper displays don't
>flicker. Even if you don't notice the flicker, moving your eyes creates
>distortion while the ePaper display is fixed.
 
Flicker doesn't bother me much, so I don't notice it. The usual
method of reducing LCD flicker is to use any vertical refresh rate
that's not 60 Hz. However, on my desktop (Samsung SyncMaster 243T
1920x1200), I'm running 60 Hz because higher refresh rates (72 and
75Hz) result in a blurred image. I can't really see it with graphics,
but with high contrast text, it's really obvious. I've also noticed
this on some other monitors but not on all monitors.
 
I don't know about eye movement causing distortion. The problem is
that on an LCD, each pixel is a combination of different color dots.
<https://www.google.com/search?q=lcd+magnified&tbm=isch>
To produce a white pixel, all the color dots need to be turned on
resulting in a large and potentially blurry pixel. That's not a
problem with e-paper, which only has to deal with turning one B&W dot
on and off.
<http://www.bit-101.com/blog/?p=2722>
Try a magnifier on your devices and see for yourself.
More on this (time permitting) if you're interested.
 
--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com>: Sep 22 04:19PM -0400

Jeff Liebermann wrote on 9/22/2017 12:54 PM:
> <http://www.bit-101.com/blog/?p=2722>
> Try a magnifier on your devices and see for yourself.
> More on this (time permitting) if you're interested.
 
Not sure what you mean when you say flicker doesn't bother you. You don't
have to see the flicker for it to cause a problem. The point is your eyes
don't adjust to a flickering screen as well as one that isn't flickering.
Your eyes constantly readjusting is what makes them tired.
 
--
 
Rick C
 
Viewed the eclipse at Wintercrest Farms,
on the centerline of totality since 1998
John-Del <ohger1s@gmail.com>: Sep 22 10:45AM -0700

On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 9:51:09 PM UTC-4, Ivan Vegvary wrote:
 
> Very little information on the web, what I would really like is a "DEFAULT RESET" function. I suppose I could put a switch in the battery circuit and do a manual shutoff.
> Thanks for any ideas.
 
> Ivan Vegvary, Oregon
 
 
 
$16.80 on ebay including shipping: item 172863952489
 
Unless you can try a firmware (available, possible?), you're looking at a $16.80 dead end...
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to sci.electronics.repair+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

No Response to "Digest for sci.electronics.repair@googlegroups.com - 22 updates in 6 topics"

Post a Comment